On 01/20/2013 09:17 PM, Chris Rorvick wrote:
I probably won't be sending any more patches on this. My hope was to
get cvsimport-3 (w/ cvsps as the engine) in a state such that one
could transition from the previous version seamlessly. But the break
in t9605 has convinced me this is not worth
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:54:36AM +0100, Michael Haggerty wrote:
On 01/20/2013 09:17 PM, Chris Rorvick wrote:
I have never used cvs2git, but I suspect Eric's efforts in making it a
potential backend for cvsimport are a better use of time.
Is it possible to perform an incremental import with
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's cvsimport patch. 7 of 15
tests in t9600 fail, one of which is fixed w/ a cvsps patch I've sent
to Eric (fixes revision map.)
Did you post the fix for the revision map
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's cvsimport patch. 7 of 15
tests in t9600 fail, one of which is fixed w/ a cvsps patch I've sent
to
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's cvsimport patch. 7 of 15
tests in t9600 fail,
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:57:50AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600, Chris Rorvick
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 10:27:16PM -0600,
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:24 PM, John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 10:57:50AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
This is not a noise, though.
Chris, how would we want to proceed? I'd prefer at some point to
see cvsimport-3 to be in sync when the one patched and tested
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Chris Rorvick ch...@rorvick.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 09:22:03AM -0600, Chris Rorvick wrote:
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:58 AM, John
I probably won't be sending any more patches on this. My hope was to
get cvsimport-3 (w/ cvsps as the engine) in a state such that one
could transition from the previous version seamlessly. But the break
in t9605 has convinced me this is not worth the effort--even in this
trivial case
These patchs apply on top of of Eric Raymond's cvsimport patch. 7 of 15
tests in t9600 fail, one of which is fixed w/ a cvsps patch I've sent
to Eric (fixes revision map.) It no longer uses origin as the default
branch which I suspect is a problem for at least some of the remaining
tests. Both
12 matches
Mail list logo
