Re: [PATCH 00/20] ref transactions part 2

Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com writes: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com wrote: This is the next 20 patches from my originally big patch series and follow the previous 19 patches that is now in juns tree. These patches were numbered 20-39 in the

Re: [PATCH 00/20] ref transactions part 2

I had a look at the changes in origin/pu and they look sane to me. make test passes all tests too. regards ronnie sahlberg On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote: Ronnie Sahlberg sahlb...@google.com writes: On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg

[PATCH 00/20] ref transactions part 2

This is the next 20 patches from my originally big patch series and follow the previous 19 patches that is now in juns tree. These patches were numbered 20-39 in the original 48-patch series. Changes since these patches were in the original series: - Addressing concerns from mhagger's review

Re: [PATCH 00/20] ref transactions part 2

Hi Michael, Here is the next set of 20 patches of those you already reviewed. I cut this patch off just before patch #40 in the previous series. These are the patches numbered 20-39 in the original series. I think I have addressed your concerns here so If you could take a quick look and