Re: [PATCH 00/22] Lockfile refactoring and pre-activation

2014-04-03 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 04/01/2014 10:44 PM, Jeff King wrote: > [...] > I think all of the patches look good. I'd prefer to hold back the final > one (and probably 19/22, which has no purpose except to prepare for > 22/22) until seeing its application in practice. OK, I shuffled 19/22 to the end of the patch series, j

Re: [PATCH 00/22] Lockfile refactoring and pre-activation

2014-04-01 Thread Jeff King
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:58:08PM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote: > I've had this patch series kicking around for a long time, along with > some followup patches to fix a race in reference deletion. I haven't > had the time to get everything done and tested, but let me at least > push this first

[PATCH 00/22] Lockfile refactoring and pre-activation

2014-04-01 Thread Michael Haggerty
I've had this patch series kicking around for a long time, along with some followup patches to fix a race in reference deletion. I haven't had the time to get everything done and tested, but let me at least push this first series out there. I especially want to submit it in case we accept a GSoC