Hi Kuba,
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016, Jakub Narębski wrote:
> W dniu 29.08.2016 o 10:03, Johannes Schindelin pisze:
>
> > This patch series marks the '4' in the countdown to speed up rebase -i
> > by implementing large parts in C. It is based on the `libify-sequencer`
> > patch series that I submitted l
W dniu 29.08.2016 o 10:03, Johannes Schindelin pisze:
> This patch series marks the '4' in the countdown to speed up rebase -i
> by implementing large parts in C. It is based on the `libify-sequencer`
> patch series that I submitted last week.
Which of those got reviewed (and perhaps accepted),
Hi Dennis,
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
> On ma, 2016-08-29 at 10:03 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> > Therefore I would be most grateful for every in-depth review.
>
> Tried to do that, but could come up only with a few nits. I think the
> approach is sensible.
Thank y
On ma, 2016-08-29 at 10:03 +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Therefore I would be most grateful for every in-depth review.
Tried to do that, but could come up only with a few nits. I think the
approach is sensible.
D.
This patch series marks the '4' in the countdown to speed up rebase -i
by implementing large parts in C. It is based on the `libify-sequencer`
patch series that I submitted last week.
The patches in this series merely prepare the sequencer code for the
next patch series that actually teaches the
5 matches
Mail list logo