On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Ronnie Sahlberg writes:
>>
>>> We call read_ref_full with a pointer to flags from rename_ref but since
>>> we never actually use the returned flags we can just pass NULL here inst
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ronnie Sahlberg writes:
>
>> We call read_ref_full with a pointer to flags from rename_ref but since
>> we never actually use the returned flags we can just pass NULL here instead.
>
> Sensible, at least for the current callers. I had to w
Ronnie Sahlberg writes:
> We call read_ref_full with a pointer to flags from rename_ref but since
> we never actually use the returned flags we can just pass NULL here instead.
Sensible, at least for the current callers. I had to wonder if
rename_ref() would never want to take advantage of the
We call read_ref_full with a pointer to flags from rename_ref but since
we never actually use the returned flags we can just pass NULL here instead.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg
---
refs.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/refs.c
4 matches
Mail list logo