Jonathan Nieder writes:
> The downside (not a new problem, but a downside nonetheless) is that
> it means the test doesn't demonstrate what --cleanup=verbatim --status
> will do.
>
> How about something like this?
Can't we be a bit more robust by not using a hardcoded block of
lines as the "expe
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> +++ w/t/t7502-commit.sh
[...]
> + # Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines
> starting
> + # with '\''#'\'' will be kept; you may remove them yourself if
> you want to.
> + # An empty message aborts the commit.
> +
Brandon Casey wrote:
> So, let's use the --no-status option to 'git commit' which will cause
> git to refrain from appending the lines of instructional text to the
> commit message. This will allow the entire resulting commit message to
> be compared against the expected value.
The downside (not
This test attempts to verify that a commit in "verbatim" mode, when
supplied a commit template, produces a commit in which the commit
message matches exactly the template that was supplied. But, since the
commit operation appends additional instructions for the user as
comments in the commit buffe
4 matches
Mail list logo
