On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Hmph, am I reading the patch to send-pack.c correctly?
>
> It detects if the other side supports the capability and leaves it
> in atomic_push_supported variable for later use, and also requests
> the feature to be activated when atomic_pus
Stefan Beller writes:
> From: Ronnie Sahlberg
>
> This adds support to the protocol between send-pack and receive-pack to
> * allow receive-pack to inform the client that it has atomic push capability
> * allow send-pack to request atomic push back.
>
> There is currently no setting in send-pack
From: Ronnie Sahlberg
This adds support to the protocol between send-pack and receive-pack to
* allow receive-pack to inform the client that it has atomic push capability
* allow send-pack to request atomic push back.
There is currently no setting in send-pack to actually request that atomic
pus
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg
---
builtin/receive-pack.c | 6 +-
send-pack.c| 12 +---
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
index 0565b94..f6b20cb 100644
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg
---
builtin/receive-pack.c | 6 +-
send-pack.c| 12 +---
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
index 0565b94..f6b20cb 100644
--- a/builtin/receive-pack.c
+++ b/builtin
5 matches
Mail list logo