Lukas Fleischer g...@cryptocrack.de writes:
These slightly improve the reading flow by making it obvious that a list
follows.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer g...@cryptocrack.de
Perhaps.
The earlier message says contains X ref(s) while the later one
says requires this/these X ref(s). Do we want to make them
consistent, too?
---
bundle.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
index 65db53b..8cd8b4f 100644
--- a/bundle.c
+++ b/bundle.c
@@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ int verify_bundle(struct bundle_header *header, int
verbose)
struct ref_list *r;
r = header-references;
- printf_ln(Q_(The bundle contains %d ref,
- The bundle contains %d refs,
+ printf_ln(Q_(The bundle contains %d ref:,
+ The bundle contains %d refs:,
r-nr),
r-nr);
list_refs(r, 0, NULL);
@@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ int verify_bundle(struct bundle_header *header, int
verbose)
if (!r-nr) {
printf_ln(_(The bundle records a complete history.));
} else {
- printf_ln(Q_(The bundle requires this ref,
- The bundle requires these %d refs,
+ printf_ln(Q_(The bundle requires this ref:,
+ The bundle requires these %d refs:,
r-nr),
r-nr);
list_refs(r, 0, NULL);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html