Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
---
git-rebase.sh | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh
index 8d7659a..2c02853 100755
--- a/git-rebase.sh
+++ b/git-rebase.sh
@@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ done
test $# -gt 2 usage
if test -n $cmd
- test $interactive_rebase != explicit
+ test $interactive_rebase != explicit
then
die $(gettext The --exec option must be used with the --interactive
option)
fi
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ case $# in
switch_to=$1
if git show-ref --verify --quiet -- refs/heads/$1
-orig_head=$(git rev-parse -q --verify refs/heads/$1)
+ orig_head=$(git rev-parse -q --verify refs/heads/$1)
then
head_name=refs/heads/$1
elif orig_head=$(git rev-parse -q --verify $1)
I am not sure about this change. I do not personally have strong
preference on this, but it would be better to be consistent.
The style of the original we see above seems to be the one that is
consistently used in this file for conditionals that span multiple
lines. That is, to align the beginning of subsequent lines with the
beginning of the conditional (i.e. the g in git show-ref on the
first line)---which happens to be in line with what we use in our C
sources, too.
I see there is one oddball in that file, though.
git-rebase.sh | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/git-rebase.sh b/git-rebase.sh
index 8d7659a..187793e 100755
--- a/git-rebase.sh
+++ b/git-rebase.sh
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ then
case $# in
0)
if ! upstream_name=$(git rev-parse --symbolic-full-name \
- --verify -q @{upstream} 2/dev/null)
+ --verify -q @{upstream} 2/dev/null)
then
. git-parse-remote
error_on_missing_default_upstream rebase rebase \
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
