On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 02:07:37PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Another option is to track it to graduate to master during the next
> > cycle. I.e., decide that the possible regression isn't a big deal.
>
> My gut feeling is that the last one is sufficient. These low level
> subcommands that
Jeff King writes:
> I'm not sure what we want to do with this. It _is_ a possible regression
> as explained above, but I really do find it improbable that anyone will
> care. Even at GitHub, where we use a custom script instead of running
> `git gc`, we hook into the repack code, and not directly
The handling of the pack.writebitmaps config option
originally happened in pack-objects, which is quite
low-level. It would make more sense for drivers of
pack-objects to read the config, and then manipulate
pack-objects with command-line options.
Recently, repack learned to do so, making the low-
3 matches
Mail list logo
