On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 05/23/2014 06:14 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
>> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Michael Haggerty
>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> When I combine these two lines of thought, it suggests to me that we
>>> could do a better job of supporting *bot
On 05/23/2014 06:14 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Michael Haggerty
> wrote:
>> [...]
>> When I combine these two lines of thought, it suggests to me that we
>> could do a better job of supporting *both* use cases. What if the
>> transaction object contained not an
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 6:49 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 05/19/2014 09:02 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
>> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Michael Haggerty
>> wrote:
>>> On 05/16/2014 07:37 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
Wrap all the ref updates inside a transaction to make the update atomic
On 05/19/2014 09:02 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Michael Haggerty
> wrote:
>> On 05/16/2014 07:37 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
>>> Wrap all the ref updates inside a transaction to make the update atomic.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg
>>> ---
>>> builtin/r
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> On 05/16/2014 07:37 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
>> Wrap all the ref updates inside a transaction to make the update atomic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg
>> ---
>> builtin/receive-pack.c | 20 ++--
>> 1 file changed
On 05/16/2014 07:37 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
> Wrap all the ref updates inside a transaction to make the update atomic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg
> ---
> builtin/receive-pack.c | 20 ++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/rec
Wrap all the ref updates inside a transaction to make the update atomic.
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg
---
builtin/receive-pack.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/receive-pack.c b/builtin/receive-pack.c
index c323081..5534138 100
7 matches
Mail list logo