Teach rebase the same shorthand as checkout and merge; that is, that -
means the branch we were previously on.
Reported-by: Tim Chase g...@tim.thechases.com
Signed-off-by: Brian Gesiak modoca...@gmail.com
---
git-rebase.sh | 4
t/t3400-rebase.sh | 11 +++
2 files changed, 15
Brian Gesiak modoca...@gmail.com writes:
diff --git a/t/t3400-rebase.sh b/t/t3400-rebase.sh
index 6d94b1f..6176754 100755
--- a/t/t3400-rebase.sh
+++ b/t/t3400-rebase.sh
@@ -88,6 +88,17 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase from ambiguous branch name' '
git rebase master
'
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:53:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
rebase - with your change still says something like this:
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
Fast-forwarded HEAD to @{-1}.
instead of Fast-forwarded HEAD to -. Somebody may later
Thank you for the feedback and tweaks!
Is the eye-candy output to the standard output what is the most
interesting during the execution of a rebase? Wouldn't we be
more interested to make sure that we did transplant the history
on the same commit between two cases?
I agree. I'll consult the
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:53:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
rebase - with your change still says something like this:
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
Fast-forwarded HEAD to @{-1}.
instead of
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:02:01PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:53:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
rebase - with your change still says something like this:
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:02:01PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:53:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
rebase - with your change still says something like this:
First,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:41:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 12:02:01PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:53:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
rebase
John Keeping j...@keeping.me.uk writes:
I thought your suggestion was:
'rebase @{-1}' says 'Fast-fowarded HEAD to @{-1}'. It should say
'Fast-forwarded HEAD to 4f407407 (rebase: allow - short-hand
for the previous branch, 2014-03-19)' instead.
Or it could be:
'rebase
9 matches
Mail list logo
