Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code

2014-03-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:

 On 02/28/2014 10:29 AM, Dmitry S. Dolzhenko wrote:
 Thank you for your remarks. In this patch I tried to take them into account.
 
 Dmitry S. Dolzhenko (11):
   builtin/pack-objects.c: change check_pbase_path() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   bundle.c: change add_to_ref_list() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   cache-tree.c: change find_subtree() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   commit.c: change register_commit_graft() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   diff.c: use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code
   diffcore-rename.c: use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code
   patch-ids.c: change add_commit() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   replace_object.c: change register_replace_object() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   reflog-walk.c: use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code
   dir.c: change create_simplify() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   attr.c: change handle_attr_line() to use ALLOC_GROW()
 
  attr.c |  7 +--
  builtin/pack-objects.c |  7 +--
  bundle.c   |  6 +-
  cache-tree.c   |  6 +-
  commit.c   |  8 ++--
  diff.c | 12 ++--
  diffcore-rename.c  | 12 ++--
  dir.c  |  5 +
  patch-ids.c|  5 +
  reflog-walk.c  | 13 +++--
  replace_object.c   |  8 ++--
  11 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

 Everything looks fine to me.  Assuming the test suite ran 100%,

 Acked-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu

Looked good (modulo titles, which I think we already discussed),
and queued on 'pu'.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[PATCH v2 00/11] Use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code

2014-02-28 Thread Dmitry S. Dolzhenko
Thank you for your remarks. In this patch I tried to take them into account.

Dmitry S. Dolzhenko (11):
  builtin/pack-objects.c: change check_pbase_path() to use ALLOC_GROW()
  bundle.c: change add_to_ref_list() to use ALLOC_GROW()
  cache-tree.c: change find_subtree() to use ALLOC_GROW()
  commit.c: change register_commit_graft() to use ALLOC_GROW()
  diff.c: use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code
  diffcore-rename.c: use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code
  patch-ids.c: change add_commit() to use ALLOC_GROW()
  replace_object.c: change register_replace_object() to use ALLOC_GROW()
  reflog-walk.c: use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code
  dir.c: change create_simplify() to use ALLOC_GROW()
  attr.c: change handle_attr_line() to use ALLOC_GROW()

 attr.c |  7 +--
 builtin/pack-objects.c |  7 +--
 bundle.c   |  6 +-
 cache-tree.c   |  6 +-
 commit.c   |  8 ++--
 diff.c | 12 ++--
 diffcore-rename.c  | 12 ++--
 dir.c  |  5 +
 patch-ids.c|  5 +
 reflog-walk.c  | 13 +++--
 replace_object.c   |  8 ++--
 11 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.5.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code

2014-02-28 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 02/28/2014 10:29 AM, Dmitry S. Dolzhenko wrote:
 Thank you for your remarks. In this patch I tried to take them into account.
 
 Dmitry S. Dolzhenko (11):
   builtin/pack-objects.c: change check_pbase_path() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   bundle.c: change add_to_ref_list() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   cache-tree.c: change find_subtree() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   commit.c: change register_commit_graft() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   diff.c: use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code
   diffcore-rename.c: use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code
   patch-ids.c: change add_commit() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   replace_object.c: change register_replace_object() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   reflog-walk.c: use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code
   dir.c: change create_simplify() to use ALLOC_GROW()
   attr.c: change handle_attr_line() to use ALLOC_GROW()
 
  attr.c |  7 +--
  builtin/pack-objects.c |  7 +--
  bundle.c   |  6 +-
  cache-tree.c   |  6 +-
  commit.c   |  8 ++--
  diff.c | 12 ++--
  diffcore-rename.c  | 12 ++--
  dir.c  |  5 +
  patch-ids.c|  5 +
  reflog-walk.c  | 13 +++--
  replace_object.c   |  8 ++--
  11 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)

Everything looks fine to me.  Assuming the test suite ran 100%,

Acked-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu

Thanks!
Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhag...@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] Use ALLOC_GROW() instead of inline code

2014-02-28 Thread Dmitry S. Dolzhenko
Michael,

On 28.02.2014 18:38, Michael Haggerty wrote:
 Everything looks fine to me.  Assuming the test suite ran 100%,
 
 Acked-by: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu

All tests passed successfully for this patch, at least on my machine.
Can I do something else to improve this patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html