On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:05:34AM +0100, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:58 PM, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:45:41AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> The idea is to never touch the COMPREPLY variable directly.
> >>
> >> This allows other completion sy
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:58 PM, SZEDER Gábor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:45:41AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> The idea is to never touch the COMPREPLY variable directly.
>>
>> This allows other completion systems override __gitcompadd, and do
>> something different instead.
>>
>> Al
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 03:45:41AM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> The idea is to never touch the COMPREPLY variable directly.
>
> This allows other completion systems override __gitcompadd, and do
> something different instead.
>
> Also, this allows the simplification of the completion tests (s
The idea is to never touch the COMPREPLY variable directly.
This allows other completion systems override __gitcompadd, and do
something different instead.
Also, this allows the simplification of the completion tests (separate
patch).
There should be no functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Felipe
4 matches
Mail list logo