Re: [PATCHv7 0/2] Rewriting repack in C

2013-08-30 Thread Stefan Beller
On 08/29/2013 10:53 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Stefan Beller writes: > >> Here is a diff since the last time sending this patch series: > > This is very readable. > > There may be people who misread "LOOSE" as "LOSE"; the option -A is > about making the unreachable ones loose so that they can

Re: [PATCHv7 0/2] Rewriting repack in C

2013-08-29 Thread Junio C Hamano
Stefan Beller writes: > Here is a diff since the last time sending this patch series: This is very readable. There may be people who misread "LOOSE" as "LOSE"; the option -A is about making the unreachable ones loose so that they can be expired, so let's rename it LOOSEN_UNREACHABLE to avoid c

[PATCHv7 0/2] Rewriting repack in C

2013-08-29 Thread Stefan Beller
Hi, I am sorry to have been delaying this patch series for a few days, as I was busy. I'll continue to be busy for the next 2 weeks, so my replies (if needed), will take some time. The first patch rewrites the repack shell script in C and tries to resemble the functionality as close to the origin