So, I read through git-stash.sh a little more, and found the following:
1. Any stash that can be shown can be applied, but not necessarily
popped or dropped (as the documentation indicates). The reason for
this is simple: a pop/drop attempts to clear the entry in the stash
reflog as well, but
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
1. Any stash that can be shown can be applied, but not necessarily
popped or dropped (as the documentation indicates). The reason for
this is simple: a pop/drop attempts to clear the entry in the stash
reflog as well, but all stashes need to
While a 'git stash show stash^{/quuxery}' works just fine, a 'git
stash pop stash^{/quuxery}' complains with: 'stash^{/quuxery} is not a
stash reference'. This confusing behavior arises from the differences
in logic that 'show' and 'pop' internally employ to validate the
specified ref. Document
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
While a 'git stash show stash^{/quuxery}' works just fine, a 'git
stash pop stash^{/quuxery}' complains with: 'stash^{/quuxery} is not a
stash reference'. This confusing behavior arises from the differences
in logic that 'show' and 'pop'
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
artag...@gmail.com wrote:
While a 'git stash show stash^{/quuxery}' works just fine, a 'git
stash pop stash^{/quuxery}' complains with: 'stash^{/quuxery} is not a
stash reference'.
I don't think it is appropriate to use the ^{/text}
Brandon Casey draf...@gmail.com writes:
The stash is implemented using the reflog. The ^{/text} notation
searches the commit history, not the reflog. So I think it will be
able to match the first entry in your stash stack, but not any of the
other ones.
Good point, together with...
An
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
Brandon Casey draf...@gmail.com writes:
The stash is implemented using the reflog. The ^{/text} notation
searches the commit history, not the reflog. So I think it will be
able to match the first entry in your stash
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Brandon Casey writes:
Just a bit of advice, maybe you should think about softening your tone
a bit hmm? I find this last sentence to be somewhat repelling and
tend to refrain from responding to such.
Oh, so it wasn't just me. I was about to say something similar,
Brandon Casey wrote:
# Save another stash here
echo bash file
git add file
git stash save something
# Now git stash show stash^{/quuxery} no longer works.
Ah, yes. My stupidity. Why was I expecting ^{/quuxery} to dig
through the
Junio C Hamano wrote:
I do not think anybody considered the approach to look at the commit
object name and making sure it appears in the reflog that implements
the stash. It sounds like a more robust check if done right.
Actually, if you think about it, there is really only one way to
specify
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
I do not think anybody considered the approach to look at the commit
object name and making sure it appears in the reflog that implements
the stash. It sounds like a more robust check if done right.
Actually, if you think
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
artag...@gmail.com wrote:
Brandon Casey wrote:
# Save another stash here
echo bash file
git add file
git stash save something
# Now git stash show stash^{/quuxery} no longer
12 matches
Mail list logo
