Hi,
> I still think that it would make the most sense to do the following
> (if you insist on some sort of automated repair):
> (1) Fetch a "good" clone (or clones) into a temporary directory;
> (2) Cannibalize the objects from it (them);
> (3) Re-run git fsck and check for still-missing / unreach
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
>> >> How would the broken repository be sure of what it is missing to
>> >> request it from the other side?
>> >
>> > fsck will find missing objects.
>>
>> And what about the objects referred to by objects that are missing?
>
> Will be fetc
> >> How would the broken repository be sure of what it is missing to
> >> request it from the other side?
> >
> > fsck will find missing objects.
>
> And what about the objects referred to by objects that are missing?
Will be fetched after multiple iterations.
We could even introduce some 'fsck
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
>> How would the broken repository be sure of what it is missing to
>> request it from the other side?
>
> fsck will find missing objects.
And what about the objects referred to by objects that are missing?
Jeff's solution doesn't suffer f
> How would the broken repository be sure of what it is missing to
> request it from the other side?
fsck will find missing objects.
>
> --
> -Drew Northup
> --
> "As opposed to vegetable or mineral error?"
> -John Pescatore, SANS New
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:21 AM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> You can't reliably just grab the broken objects, because most
>> transports
>> don't support grabbing arbitrary objects (you can do it if you have
>> shell access to a known-good repository, but it's not automated).
>
> can we intro
Hi,
> You can't reliably just grab the broken objects, because most
> transports
> don't support grabbing arbitrary objects (you can do it if you have
> shell access to a known-good repository, but it's not automated).
can we introduce a new or extend existing transports to support that ?
cu
--
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 06:51:45PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> I've broken some repo (missing objects), eg by messing something up
> w/ alternates, broken filesystem, or whatever. And I've got a bunch
> of remotes which (together) contain all of the lost objects.
>
> Now I'd like to run some $
Hi folks,
suppose the following scenario:
I've broken some repo (missing objects), eg by messing something up
w/ alternates, broken filesystem, or whatever. And I've got a bunch
of remotes which (together) contain all of the lost objects.
Now I'd like to run some $magic_command which automatical
9 matches
Mail list logo
