On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 09:39:45AM -0400, Matt McClure wrote:
Can `git blame` show the date that each line was merged to the current
branch rather than the date it was committed?
Not exactly. Git does not record when a commit entered a particular
branch (or what the ours branch was called
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
Aside: in some trial and error I notice this oddity:
$ git blame --merges
usage: git blame [options] [rev-opts] [rev] [--] file
[rev-opts] are documented in git-rev-list(1)
...
Your problem is not the
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
diff --git a/builtin/blame.c b/builtin/blame.c
index 57a487e..0fb67af 100644
--- a/builtin/blame.c
+++ b/builtin/blame.c
@@ -1199,6 +1199,8 @@ static int num_scapegoats(struct rev_info *revs, struct
commit *commit)
{
int cnt;
struct
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:28:06AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
(though I suspect it would interact oddly with the --reverse option,
and we would want to either declare them mutually exclusive or figure
out some sane semantics).
It is entirely unclear who the first child is, so I tend to
4 matches
Mail list logo
