On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 04:03:11AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
I have some free time to come, and would like to work on that feature.
Does the offer still hold ?
If it does, I would be interested in your patches.
I'm sorry I have taken so long to get back to you on this. I was hoping
to
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 04:03:11AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
I have some free time to come, and would like to work on that feature.
Does the offer still hold ?
If it does, I would be interested in your patches.
I'm sorry I
Someone at $work asked me this week how to find the current and
previous tags on his branch so he could generate release notes. I
just need last two tags on head in topo-order. I was surprised by
how complicated this turned out to be. I ended up with this:
git log --decorate=full
Phil Hord phil.h...@gmail.com writes:
Someone at $work asked me this week how to find the current and
previous tags on his branch so he could generate release notes. I
just need last two tags on head in topo-order. I was surprised by
how complicated this turned out to be. I ended up with
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:12:47PM +0200, Antoine Pelisse wrote:
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
I do plan to finish it eventually, but if anyone else feels like picking
it up, I'd be glad to review patches and/or share my work-in-progress as
a starting
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Rahul Bansal rahul.ban...@rtcamp.com wrote:
I am posting here first time, so please excuse me if this is not right place
to send something like this.
Please check -
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org writes:
Rahul Bansal rahul.ban...@rtcamp.com writes:
IMHO git tag is expected to show tag-list ordered by versions.
A git tag can be anything, not related to versions at all.
Correct.
But that does not prevent somebody to add git tag --sort=X option
to
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:40:55PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org writes:
Rahul Bansal rahul.ban...@rtcamp.com writes:
IMHO git tag is expected to show tag-list ordered by versions.
A git tag can be anything, not related to versions at all.
I am posting here first time, so please excuse me if this is not right place to
send something like this.
Please check -
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6091306/can-i-make-git-print-x-y-z-style-tag-names-in-a-sensible-order
And also - https://github.com/gitlabhq/gitlabhq/issues/4565
IMHO
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Rahul Bansal rahul.ban...@rtcamp.com wrote:
I am posting here first time, so please excuse me if this is not right place
to send something like this.
Please check -
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
Try
git for-each-ref --sort=committerdate --format='%(refname:short)' refs/tags
And I wondered why it did not seem right. Use this one instead
git for-each-ref --sort=taggerdate --format='%(refname:short)' refs/tags
make
Hi Day,
I am aware of that command as well.
I think `git tag` current default order is string-based sorting. I
felt version-number based sorting and/or create-date based sorting
will be more appropriate.
--
Rahul Bansal | Founder CEO | rtCamp Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Skype: rahul286 | Twitter:
Thanks again Duy. :-)
Sorry for misspelling your name in earlier email.
--
Rahul Bansal | Founder CEO | rtCamp Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
Skype: rahul286 | Twitter: @rahul286 | Web: http://rtcamp.com/
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:26 PM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:51
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Rahul Bansal rahul.ban...@rtcamp.com wrote:
Hi Day,
I am aware of that command as well.
I think `git tag` current default order is string-based sorting. I
felt version-number based sorting and/or create-date based sorting
will be more appropriate.
ok you
Rahul Bansal rahul.ban...@rtcamp.com writes:
IMHO git tag is expected to show tag-list ordered by versions.
A git tag can be anything, not related to versions at all.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
15 matches
Mail list logo
