Re: How to mark a complete sub-directory assume-unchanged/skip-worktree?

2014-02-28 Thread Philip Oakley
From: Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Philip Oakley philipoak...@iee.org wrote: Is there a particular bit of code I'd be worth studying for the partial index example to see how well it might fit my ideas? My last attempt was

How to mark a complete sub-directory assume-unchanged/skip-worktree?

2014-02-27 Thread Philip Oakley
I'm having a long think (sickness RR) about the possible options for a narrow clone implementation. Is there currently any way in the code base that a complete sub-directory can be marked as 'missing' as could be the case for a narrow clone? The assume-unchanged/skip-worktree are close but only

Re: How to mark a complete sub-directory assume-unchanged/skip-worktree?

2014-02-27 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Philip Oakley philipoak...@iee.org wrote: Have there been previous attempts to look at marking sub-dirs as --skip-worktree, or some other sentinel value for the missing tree? I dealt with this by creating partial index, that only contains entries for interested

Re: How to mark a complete sub-directory assume-unchanged/skip-worktree?

2014-02-27 Thread Philip Oakley
From: Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:25 AM, Philip Oakley philipoak...@iee.org wrote: Have there been previous attempts to look at marking sub-dirs as --skip-worktree, or some other sentinel value for the missing tree? I dealt with this by creating partial index, that