On Wednesday 23 October 2019 13:09:51 CEST Denton Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:15:15AM +, Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> > On Wednesday 23 October 2019 10:55:03 CEST Denton Liu wrote:
> > > I am currently have a WIP patchset that will print the location of the
> > > failed patch file (.git
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:15:15AM +, Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 October 2019 10:55:03 CEST Denton Liu wrote:
> > I am currently have a WIP patchset that will print the location of the
> > failed patch file (.git/rebase-apply/patch) in the case of a failure as
> > well as the line
t; to apply a patch sent using "git send-email". This
> > > > patch does not apply properly. I try to use "git am
> > > > --show-current-patch"
> > > > to understand the problem. However, since original mail is encoded in
> > > > quo
t; > patch does not apply properly. I try to use "git am --show-current-patch"
> > > to understand the problem. However, since original mail is encoded in
> > > quoted-
> > > printable, data returned by --show-current-patch is not a valid patch.
> >
&
> > to understand the problem. However, since original mail is encoded in
> > quoted-
> > printable, data returned by --show-current-patch is not a valid patch.
>
> I agree that --show-current-patch is a misdesigned feature. We'd be
> doing a better service to our use
The existing wording gives an impression that it only gives the
contents of the $GIT_DIR/rebase-apply/patch file, i.e. the patch
proper, but the option actually emits the entire e-mail message
being processed (iow, one of the output files from "git mailsplit").
Signed-off-by: Juni
Jerome Pouiller writes:
> Hello all,
>
> I try to use "git am" to apply a patch sent using "git send-email". This
> patch does not apply properly. I try to use "git am --show-current-patch"
> to understand the problem. However, since original mail is
ilinfo.txt b/Documentation/git-mailinfo.txt
index 3bbc731f67..14a2cca08c 100644
--- a/Documentation/git-mailinfo.txt
+++ b/Documentation/git-mailinfo.txt
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ git-mailinfo - Extracts patch and authorship from a single
e-mail message
SYNOPSIS
[verse]
-'git mailinfo' [-k|-
Hello all,
I try to use "git am" to apply a patch sent using "git send-email". This
patch does not apply properly. I try to use "git am --show-current-patch"
to understand the problem. However, since original mail is encoded in quoted-
printable, data returned by
Do you receive the mail i send to you?
Apologies list! Thanks Kevin. That's what I get for troubleshooting
plain-text in Gmail and quickly sending a subscribe email before
walking out.
Robert
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 3:18 PM Kevin Daudt wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 03:11:33PM -0500, Robert Morgan wrote:
> > subscribe git
>
>
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 03:11:33PM -0500, Robert Morgan wrote:
> subscribe git
You need to send this to majord...@vger.kernel.org. Sending it to the
git mailing list will not do a lot.
Kevin
Cher utilisateur de messagerie,
Dans nos efforts pour fournir un excellent service à tous nos utilisateurs,
nous prévoyons d'effectuer une mise à niveau du système. Le processus prend
environ 30 minutes. Ce message est diffusé depuis quelque temps déjà et nous
conseillons aux utilisateurs de se
Cher utilisateur de messagerie,
Dans nos efforts pour fournir un excellent service à tous nos utilisateurs,
nous prévoyons d'effectuer une mise à niveau du système. Le processus prend
environ 30 minutes. Ce message est diffusé depuis quelque temps déjà et nous
conseillons aux utilisateurs de se
Cher utilisateur de messagerie,
Dans nos efforts pour fournir un excellent service à tous nos utilisateurs,
nous prévoyons d'effectuer une mise à niveau du système. Le processus prend
environ 30 minutes. Ce message est diffusé depuis quelque temps déjà et nous
conseillons aux utilisateurs de se
>
> Hello,
>
> we are periodically doing a 'git p4 sync' on a p4 clone that was initially
> created by 'git p4 clone --bare //DEPOT'. Now on P4 side the mail addresses
> have
> changed, but git still uses the old addresses.
> p4 users already shows
Hello,
we are periodically doing a 'git p4 sync' on a p4 clone that was initially
created by 'git p4 clone --bare //DEPOT'. Now on P4 side the mail addresses have
changed, but git still uses the old addresses.
p4 users already shows the new addresses but new changes in the git
Test mail
"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget"
writes:
> From: Johannes Schindelin
>
> We have three email addresses for Clemens in our commit history, two of
> them bouncing. Let's map the latter to the only one that still works.
>
> Pointed out by Gábor Szeder.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
From: Johannes Schindelin
We have three email addresses for Clemens in our commit history, two of
them bouncing. Let's map the latter to the only one that still works.
Pointed out by Gábor Szeder.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin
---
.mailmap | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 12:47:35PM +0300, Furkan DURUL wrote:
> Hello,
> My name is Furkan. I'm a new graduated Electronics and Communication
> Engineer in Turkey. In my current workplace, we use Git in all our
> projects and I really learned a lot from your Pro Git Book. I would
> like to contribu
Hello, have you study the project proposal i sent you?
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Hello,
My name is ms. Reem Al-Hashimi. The UAE minister of state for international
cooparation. I got your contact from an email database from your country. I
have a financial transaction i would like to discuss with you. Please reply to
reem2...@daum.net, for more details if you are interested
Website: www.westernunion.com
Address: Plot 1261, Adela Hopewell Street CO/B/REP, Republic Of Benin.
Email: westernunibe...@seznam.cz
Attention: E-mail Address Owner,
Sequel to the meeting held with Federal Bureau of Investigation, The
International Monetary Fund (IMF) is compensating all the
--
Website: www.westernunion.com
Address: Plot 1261, Adela Hopewell Street CO/B/REP, Republic Of Benin.
Email: westernunibe...@seznam.cz
Attention: E-mail Address Owner,
Sequel to the meeting held with Federal Bureau of Investigation, The
International Monetary Fund (IMF) is compensating
would want to know, so I can
try to follow up somehow and deal with it as-is.
I think the main purpose of the mail map file until now was to consolidate
multiple identities into one (e.g. misspellings or capitalisation issues in
names, different email addresses for all the same person), now you
[Sorry about the double send in private, forgot to CC the list]
On Mon, Sep 17 2018, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> Brandon, b0db704652[...]
I noticed a few days ago that CC's to bmw...@google.com bounce. Has he
left Google, and if so is he still interested in being CC'd on Git stuff
(maybe he'll chime i
advised
that you should keep this transaction a top secret and rest all correspondence
to e-mail
or phone only for confidential reason.
To enable me start the process and remittance of the fund into your bank
account successfully within 10 banking days, I need the following information
from you
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 2:04 AM, 陶青云 wrote:
> Sorry to intrude, but I can't send a patch to the maillist using
> qq.com and 163.com SMTP server.
Do you have a git with this patch: http://github.com/git/git/commit/5453b83bdf ?
It worked for 赵小强 on 163.com, maybe it'll work for you too.
Sorry to intrude, but I can't send a patch to the maillist using
qq.com and 163.com SMTP server.
Hi,
Using git format-patch --thread + send-mail leads to
In-Reply-To/References headers added twice (with the very same value).
This is not allowed according to RFC 5322 Section 3.6:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.6
Ideally probably git-format-patch should be smart about whether
Update our copy of Mail::Address from 2.19 (Aug 22, 2017) to 2.20 (Jan
23, 2018). Like the preceding Error.pm update this is done simply to
keep up-to-date with upstream, and as can be shown from the diff
there's no functional changes.
The updated source was retrieved from
Update our copy of Mail::Address from 2.19 (Aug 22, 2017) to 2.20 (Jan
23, 2018). Like the preceding Error.pm update this is done simply to
keep up-to-date with upstream, and as can be shown from the diff
there's no functional changes.
The updated source was retrieved from
On Thu, Feb 15 2018, Matthieu Moy jotted:
> "Jonathan Nieder" wrote:
>
>> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>>
>> > Update our copy of Mail::Address from 2.19 (Aug 22, 2017) to 2.20 (Jan
>> > 23, 2018). This should be a trivial update[1] but it s
"Jonathan Nieder" wrote:
> Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
>
> > Update our copy of Mail::Address from 2.19 (Aug 22, 2017) to 2.20 (Jan
> > 23, 2018). This should be a trivial update[1] but it seems the version
> > Matthieu Moy imported in bd869f67b9 ("send
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> Update our copy of Mail::Address from 2.19 (Aug 22, 2017) to 2.20 (Jan
> 23, 2018). This should be a trivial update[1] but it seems the version
> Matthieu Moy imported in bd869f67b9 ("send-email: add and use a local
> copy of Mail::Address"
Update our copy of Mail::Address from 2.19 (Aug 22, 2017) to 2.20 (Jan
23, 2018). This should be a trivial update[1] but it seems the version
Matthieu Moy imported in bd869f67b9 ("send-email: add and use a local
copy of Mail::Address", 2018-01-05) doesn't correspond to any 2.19
v
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 7:36 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> create mode 100644 perl/Git/FromCPAN/Mail/Address.pm
> create mode 100755 perl/Git/Mail/Address.pm
I didn't notice this in my initial review, but just now when it's
landed in master and it's shiny-green in my terminal
Matthieu Moy writes:
> We used to have two versions of the email parsing code. Our
> parse_mailboxes (in Git.pm), and Mail::Address which we used if
> installed. Unfortunately, both versions have different sets of bugs, and
> changing the behavior of git depending on whether Mail
We used to have two versions of the email parsing code. Our
parse_mailboxes (in Git.pm), and Mail::Address which we used if
installed. Unfortunately, both versions have different sets of bugs, and
changing the behavior of git depending on whether Mail::Address is
installed was a bad idea.
A first
We used to have two versions of the email parsing code. Our
parse_mailboxes (in Git.pm), and Mail::Address which we used if
installed. Unfortunately, both versions have different sets of bugs, and
changing the behavior of git depending on whether Mail::Address is
installed was a bad idea.
A first
On Thu, Jan 04 2018, Matthieu Moy jotted:
> I looked at the perl/Git/Error.pm wrapper, and ended up writting a
> different, much simpler version. I'm not sure the same approach would
> apply to Error.pm, but my straightforward version does the job for
> Mail/Address.pm.
Ye
On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> We used to have two versions of the email parsing code. Our
> parse_mailboxes (in Git.pm), and Mail::Address which we used if
> installed. Unfortunately, both versions have different sets of bugs, and
> changing the behavior of g
We used to have two versions of the email parsing code. Our
parse_mailboxes (in Git.pm), and Mail::Address which we used if
installed. Unfortunately, both versions have different sets of bugs, and
changing the behavior of git depending on whether Mail::Address is
installed was a bad idea.
A first
Ich beabsichtige, Ihnen einen Teil meines Vermögens als freiwillige finanzielle
Spende an Sie zu geben. Reagieren Sie auf partake.contact meine E-Mail
(wang.jian...@yandex.com)
Wang Jianlin
Wanda Gruppe
Using Mail::Address made sense when we didn't have a proper parser. We
now have a reasonable address parser, and using Mail::Address
_if available_ causes much more trouble than it gives benefits:
* Developers typically test one version, not both.
* Users may not be aware that installing
Using Mail::Address made sense when we didn't have a proper parser. We
now have a reasonable address parser, and using Mail::Address
_if available_ causes much more trouble than it gives benefits:
* Developers typically test one version, not both.
* Users may not be aware that installing
OPEN ATTACHEDMENT FILE FOR MORE DETAILS 90.rtf
Description: RTF file
Jeff King writes:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:23:17PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Otoh, "community" page does not encourage subscription as a way to
>> ensure you'll see follow-up discussion, which may be a good thing to
>> add.
>>
>> A tangent I just found funny is this paragraph on the
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 10:23:17PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Otoh, "community" page does not encourage subscription as a way to
> ensure you'll see follow-up discussion, which may be a good thing to
> add.
>
> A tangent I just found funny is this paragraph on the "community"
> page:
>
>
On 22 June 2017 at 23:58, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
> +You don't need to be subscribed to the list to send mail to it, and
> +others on-list will generally CC you when replying (although some
> +forget this). It's adviced to subscribe to the list if you want to be
Jeff King writes:
>> +You don't need to be subscribed to the list to send mail to it, and
>> +others on-list will generally CC you when replying (although some
>> +forget this). It's adviced to subscribe to the list if you want to be
>> +sure you're not m
it> and other archival sites.
>
> +You don't need to be subscribed to the list to send mail to it, and
> +others on-list will generally CC you when replying (although some
> +forget this). It's adviced to subscribe to the list if you want to be
> +sure you're not mi
s are
> available at <https://public-inbox.org/git/>,
> <http://marc.info/?l=git> and other archival sites.
>
> +You don't need to be subscribed to the list to send mail to it, and
> +others on-list will generally CC you when replying (although some
> +forget thi
..@vger.kernel.org. The mailing list archives are
> available at <https://public-inbox.org/git/>,
It's unclear what that means. I *think* it means "consider taking a look
around the list before you post", but then it's probably better advice
to tell people to skim the
Simon Ruderich writes:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:55:27PM +, Patrick Lehmann wrote:
>> The description on https://github.com/git/git doesn't reflect that policy.
>>
>> a)
>> It explains that discussions take place in the mentioned mailing list.
>> b)
>> It describes how to subscribe.
>
> Ho
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:55:27PM +, Patrick Lehmann wrote:
> The description on https://github.com/git/git doesn't reflect that policy.
>
> a)
> It explains that discussions take place in the mentioned mailing list.
> b)
> It describes how to subscribe.
However it doesn't say that you have t
ation.
Von: Simon Ruderich [si...@ruderich.org]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017 15:47
Bis: Patrick Lehmann
Cc: Jessie Hernandez; git@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: your mail
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:35:33PM +, Patrick Lehmann wrote:
> But how can he
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:35:33PM +, Patrick Lehmann wrote:
> But how can he write to the mailing list without a subscription?
> Is this a security bug or is he already subscribed?
Everybody can send to this mailing list. This is by design so
contributors/bug reporters can send mails without
erstag, 22. Juni 2017 14:48
Bis: Jessie Hernandez
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: your mail
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:50:01AM +0200, Jessie Hernandez wrote:
> subscribe git
You need to write to majord...@vger.kernel.org (with subscribe
git in the body) to subscribe.
Regards
Simon
--
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:50:01AM +0200, Jessie Hernandez wrote:
> subscribe git
You need to write to majord...@vger.kernel.org (with subscribe
git in the body) to subscribe.
Regards
Simon
--
+ privacy is necessary
+ using gnupg http://gnupg.org
+ public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9
Hallo,
bei der Recherche zum E-Book "E-Mail: Anbieter und Software" bin ich auf Ihre
Webseite aufmerksam geworden. Eventuell ist das E-Book ja auch für Ihre Leser
interessant:
http://www.homepage-erstellen.de/thema/e-mail
Wäre es möglich, dass Sie meine Webseite bzw. das E-Book verli
From: "Vitaly \"_Vi\" Shukela"
Signed-off-by: Vitaly "_Vi" Shukela
---
.mailmap | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.mailmap b/.mailmap
index 9cc33e9..b7ae81a 100644
--- a/.mailmap
+++ b/.mailmap
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ Uwe Kleine-König
Uwe Kleine-König
Vill
Dear Web-mail Account User,
You have receive this message as resulting to a wrong multiple password attempt
on this account, Hence we shall be blocking this account temporarily to verify
the IP location. If you know this has not been done by you and want to prevent
blocking of this account as
This is just a test mail to test whether the bullet offends vger, still,
even with the headers indicated by Peff:
• This is a bullet point.
Fingers crossed,
Dscho
From: Hopfauf, Sandee
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 10:36 AM
Subject: E-mail User:-
Dear E-mail User:-
Take note of this important update that our new web mail has been improved with
a new messaging system from Owa/outlook which also include faster usage
your positive mail.
Best Regards,
Email : shr...@rapicalweb.us
Online Marketing Consultant
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Subject: [RFC-PATCH 2/2] t9001: adding --quote-mail option test
We write messages at imperative tone, hence s/adding/add/
Tom Russello writes:
> From: Tom Russello
Please use the same identity for email and commit to avoid this line.
> ---
>
>
> diff --git a/t/t9001
On 05/23/2016 09:38 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
Tom Russello writes:
Hello,
With the current send-email command, you can send a series of patches "in reply
to" an email.
This patch adds a new option to `git send-email`, `--quote-mail=`, to
I think the option name should be --q
Tom Russello writes:
> Hello,
>
> With the current send-email command, you can send a series of patches "in
> reply
> to" an email.
> This patch adds a new option to `git send-email`, `--quote-mail=`, to
I think the option name should be --quote-email. Even though
?
+ > Previous content
+ EOF
+'
+
+test_expect_success $PREREQ 'From, To, Cc, Subject with --quote-mail are
correct' '
+ clean_fake_sendmail &&
+ git send-email \
+ --quote-mail=email \
+ --from="Ex
Hello,
With the current send-email command, you can send a series of patches "in reply
to" an email.
This patch adds a new option to `git send-email`, `--quote-mail=`, to
quote an email in the cover letter in your series of patches.
The "To", "Cc" and &
t
project is quite a little bit too tedious, even for old timers like me, in
particular when compared to the ease of opening Pull Requests a la GitHub.
So now I cleaned up my script a bit and published it here:
https://github.com/dscho/mail-patch-series
Ironically, I welcome Pull Requests for
I am Capt. Lawrence Tyman, an officer in US Army,and also a West Point
Graduate, serving in the Military with the 82nd Air Borne Division
Peace keeping force deployed from Afganistan to Syria.
We were moved to Syria from Iraq as the last batch just left,and i
really need your help in assisting me
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 07:04:23PM +, miwilli...@google.com wrote:
> From 7201fe08ede76e502211a781250c9a0b702a78b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mike Williams
> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:18:39 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] wt-status: Remove '!!' from
> wt_status_collect_changed_cb
These bi
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:28:59PM -0700, Stefan Beller wrote:
> To reproduce:
>
> $ git config sendemail.aliasesfile ~/.mailrc
> $ git config sendemail.aliasfiletype mailrc
> $ echo "alias zzz_wrong_entry jon@do.e "
> # notice the white space at the end of the alias
>
> $ git send-email 0001-re
To reproduce:
$ git config sendemail.aliasesfile ~/.mailrc
$ git config sendemail.aliasfiletype mailrc
$ echo "alias zzz_wrong_entry jon@do.e "
# notice the white space at the end of the alias
$ git send-email 0001-rebase-x-do-not-die-without-i.patch --cc=zzz_wrong_entry
Use of uninitialized valu
s, and
most will simply ignore the patch. Thanks.
Before sending v3 (inline), perhaps take note of the few issues below
which I noticed while quickly scanning the attachment:
* The final paragraph of the commit message appears to be outdated
since it still seems to be describing the appro
c57cdd63, many people did the following:
git config --global user.email "(none)"
This was helpful for people with more than one E-Mail address,
targeting different E-Mail addresses for different clones.
as it barred git from creating commit unless the user.email
config was set in t
Jeff King writes:
> Just when I dare to think "somebody cannot possibly be relying on this
> arcane behavior", I am proven wrong. :)
My thoughts, exactly. This is the kind of thing that makes this
project uncomfortably "interesting"; we cannot make improvements
without risking breaking existing
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 12:26:36PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> >> Should we generalize this use case, i.e. define a list of
> >> configuration variables that must be (re-)defined per-repo? Maybe not
> >> worth it, I don't know. I can't think of any other variable that
> >> should behave this way of
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Jeff King wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 12:19:20PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> > I find it disappointing that we go back to looking for magic sequences
>> > in the string. Could we perhaps do this more clea
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 12:19:20PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> > I find it disappointing that we go back to looking for magic sequences
> > in the string. Could we perhaps do this more cleanly with a new config
> > option? Like a "user.guessIdent
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> I find it disappointing that we go back to looking for magic sequences
> in the string. Could we perhaps do this more cleanly with a new config
> option? Like a "user.guessIdent" which defaults to true, but people can
> set to false. And without
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 09:54:21PM +0200, Dan Aloni wrote:
> Previously, before 5498c57cdd63, many people did the following:
>
>git config --global user.email "(none)"
>
> This was helpful for people with more than one E-Mail address,
> targeting different E-
Previously, before 5498c57cdd63, many people did the following:
git config --global user.email "(none)"
This was helpful for people with more than one E-Mail address,
targeting different E-Mail addresses for different clones.
as it barred git from creating commit unless the user.em
Our e-mail content detector has just been triggered by a message you sent:
To: japan11-boun...@scoutingingreenwich.org.uk
Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail
Date: Tue Sep 29 07:39:12 2015
One or more of the attachments (document.com) are on
the list of unacceptable attachments for
servers, it's not necessarily indicative
> of whether the change has actually propagated to the DNS server(s)
> answering web.de's mail server's queries. Local configuration (TTL's,
> etc.) on those servers or anywhere in between, as well as network
> conditions, cou
an A just in case, though who knows how long
>> it will take for the change to propagate over to web.de's server.
> Anyone can check Here https://dnschecker.org/#CNAME/Mail.sunshineco.com
> It would fail with your change
Interesting service; thanks for the pointer. However, since it's
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Johannes Löthberg
wrote:
> On 23/08, René Scharfe wrote:
>> Eric, hope you see this reply on the list. Direct replies to
>> sunsh...@sunshineco.com are rejected by my mail provider on submit in
>> Thunderbird with the following message:
>
On 23/08, René Scharfe wrote:
Eric, hope you see this reply on the list. Direct replies to
sunsh...@sunshineco.com are rejected by my mail provider on submit in
Thunderbird with the following message:
Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
invalid DNS MX or A/ resource
Eric, hope you see this reply on the list. Direct replies to
sunsh...@sunshineco.com are rejected by my mail provider on submit in
Thunderbird with the following message:
Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
invalid DNS MX or A/ resource record.
And with this one when
Since 271440e (git-am: make it easier after fixing up an unapplicable
patch., 2005-10-25), when "git am" is run again after being paused, the
current mail message will not be re-parsed, but instead the contents of
the state directory's patch, msg and author-script files will be use
A phish attempt, banned phrase or sensitive information was detected in a
message sent to you and the original message has been quarantined.Please
you are to re-validate your email address by providing your Username(...)
and Password(.) for verifications now.
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe fro
Since 271440e (git-am: make it easier after fixing up an unapplicable
patch., 2005-10-25), when "git am" is run again after being paused, the
current mail message will not be re-parsed, but instead the contents of
the state directory's patch, msg and author-script files will be use
On Feb 20, 2015, at 9:16 PM, Technext wrote:
> Thanks Junio for the prompt reply! :) Yes, that's exactly how i would like
> things to be. I'll definitely try to push this thing and see if this flow
> can be implemented.
>
> However, can you please guide me whether there's any way i could have
>
A postaláda túllépte, kérjük kattintson ide
https://formcrafts.com/a/7434
e-mail Thanks
Administrator E-Mail rendszer.
Köszönjük az együttműködést!
E-mail Web Team @ 2014
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
