Dear diary, on Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 04:49:26AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Junio remarked that Jeff's git-changes-script still uses git-rev-tree, and
> > therefore it should not be removed. T
Hi,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Junio remarked that Jeff's git-changes-script still uses git-rev-tree, and
> > therefore it should not be removed. This patch changes git-changes-script
> > over to git-rev-list:
>
> Just to
On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 07:49:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Junio remarked that Jeff's git-changes-script still uses git-rev-tree, and
> > therefore it should not be removed. This patch changes git-changes-script
> > over to git-rev-lis
Johannes Schindelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Junio remarked that Jeff's git-changes-script still uses git-rev-tree, and
> therefore it should not be removed. This patch changes git-changes-script
> over to git-rev-list:
Just to make things clear, "Junio remarked" that Cogito also
seems to
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>
> Junio remarked that Jeff's git-changes-script still uses git-rev-tree, and
> therefore it should not be removed. This patch changes git-changes-script
> over to git-rev-list:
It really should be totally rewritten, to take advantage of git-rev
Hi,
Junio remarked that Jeff's git-changes-script still uses git-rev-tree, and
therefore it should not be removed. This patch changes git-changes-script
over to git-rev-list:
--- git-changes-script.orig Tue Aug 9 02:21:36 2005
+++ git-changes-script Tue Aug 9 02:20:53 2005
@@ -85,14 +85,
6 matches
Mail list logo