On Friday, December 21, 2012 06:41:43 pm Earl Gresh wrote:
> Hi-
>
> I have observed that after running GC, one particular git
> repository ended up with some missing refs in the
> refs/changes/* namespace the Gerrit uses for storing
> patch sets. The refs were valid and should not have been
> pru
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 05:41:43PM -0800, Earl Gresh wrote:
> I have observed that after running GC, one particular git repository
> ended up with some missing refs in the refs/changes/* namespace the
> Gerrit uses for storing patch sets. The refs were valid and should not
> have been pruned. Conc
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Earl Gresh wrote:
>
> Is anyone familiar with git gc deleting valid references? I'm running
> git version 1.7.8. Have there been any patches in later git releases
> that might address this issue ( if it is a git problem )?
I have not seen any relevant changes
Hi-
I have observed that after running GC, one particular git repository ended up
with some missing refs in the refs/changes/* namespace the Gerrit uses for
storing patch sets. The refs were valid and should not have been pruned.
Concerned about loosing data, GC is still enabled but ref packing
4 matches
Mail list logo
