Thomas Rast writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Thomas Rast writes:
>>
>>> David Kastrup writes:
>>>
Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using
gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for
profile-based compilation rather than using
David Kastrup writes:
> Thomas Rast writes:
>
>> David Kastrup writes:
>>
>>> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using
>>> gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for
>>> profile-based compilation rather than using gprof.
>> [...]
>>> Is there a
Thomas Rast writes:
> David Kastrup writes:
>
>> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using
>> gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for
>> profile-based compilation rather than using gprof.
> [...]
>> Is there a reason there are no prewired recip
David Kastrup writes:
> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using
> gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for
> profile-based compilation rather than using gprof.
[...]
> Is there a reason there are no prewired recipes or advice for using
> gprof
David Kastrup writes:
> John Keeping writes:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:41:55PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Duy Nguyen writes:
>>>
>>> > Would perf help? No changes required, and almost no overhead, I think.
>>>
>>> Not useful. It would be probably nice for nailing down the performan
John Keeping writes:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:41:55PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Duy Nguyen writes:
>>
>> > Would perf help? No changes required, and almost no overhead, I think.
>>
>> Not useful. It would be probably nice for nailing down the performance
>> gains when the work is fini
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:41:55PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Duy Nguyen writes:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> >>
> >> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using
> >> gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for
> >
Duy Nguyen writes:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using
>> gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for
>> profile-based compilation rather than using gprof.
>>
>> Now since I've man
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using
> gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for
> profile-based compilation rather than using gprof.
>
> Now since I've managed to push most of the runt
Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using
gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for
profile-based compilation rather than using gprof.
Now since I've managed to push most of the runtime for basic git-blame
operation out of blame.c proper, it becom
10 matches
Mail list logo