Re: Profiling support?

2014-02-16 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Rast writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> Thomas Rast writes: >> >>> David Kastrup writes: >>> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for profile-based compilation rather than using

Re: Profiling support?

2014-02-16 Thread Thomas Rast
David Kastrup writes: > Thomas Rast writes: > >> David Kastrup writes: >> >>> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using >>> gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for >>> profile-based compilation rather than using gprof. >> [...] >>> Is there a

Re: Profiling support?

2014-02-16 Thread David Kastrup
Thomas Rast writes: > David Kastrup writes: > >> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using >> gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for >> profile-based compilation rather than using gprof. > [...] >> Is there a reason there are no prewired recip

Re: Profiling support?

2014-02-16 Thread Thomas Rast
David Kastrup writes: > Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using > gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for > profile-based compilation rather than using gprof. [...] > Is there a reason there are no prewired recipes or advice for using > gprof

Re: Profiling support?

2014-02-11 Thread David Kastrup
David Kastrup writes: > John Keeping writes: > >> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:41:55PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >>> Duy Nguyen writes: >>> >>> > Would perf help? No changes required, and almost no overhead, I think. >>> >>> Not useful. It would be probably nice for nailing down the performan

Re: Profiling support?

2014-02-11 Thread David Kastrup
John Keeping writes: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:41:55PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> Duy Nguyen writes: >> >> > Would perf help? No changes required, and almost no overhead, I think. >> >> Not useful. It would be probably nice for nailing down the performance >> gains when the work is fini

Re: Profiling support?

2014-02-11 Thread John Keeping
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 03:41:55PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Duy Nguyen writes: > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using > >> gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for > >

Re: Profiling support?

2014-02-11 Thread David Kastrup
Duy Nguyen writes: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> >> Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using >> gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for >> profile-based compilation rather than using gprof. >> >> Now since I've man

Re: Profiling support?

2014-02-11 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:17 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using > gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for > profile-based compilation rather than using gprof. > > Now since I've managed to push most of the runt

Profiling support?

2014-02-11 Thread David Kastrup
Looking in the Makefile, I just find support for coverage reports using gcov. Whatever is there with "profile" in it seems to be for profile-based compilation rather than using gprof. Now since I've managed to push most of the runtime for basic git-blame operation out of blame.c proper, it becom