[RFC] Proposal for a new config-based git signing interface

2019-10-23 Thread Ibrahim El
Hello, This is a follow-up on my previous emails related to the proposal of a new signing interface: https://public-inbox.org/git/CACi-FhDeAZecXSM36zroty6kpf2BCWLS=0r+duwub96lqfk...@mail.gmail.com/T/#r43cbf31b86642ab5118e6e7b3d4098bade5f5a0a https://public-inbox.org/git

PROPOSAL

2019-09-24 Thread kojii0298
Hello, We wish to retain your service as an intermediary representative on a contract basis.If interested please advise for contract info. Manager.

RES: PROPOSAL.

2019-07-30 Thread José Luiz Fabris
De: José Luiz Fabris Enviado: terça-feira, 30 de julho de 2019 18:37 Para: José Luiz Fabris Assunto: PROPOSAL. Good Day, I am Mrs.Margaret Ko May-Yee Leung Deputy Managing Director and Executive Director of Chong Hing Bank Limited. I write briefly to

Re: [Proposal] git am --check

2019-06-03 Thread Junio C Hamano
uot; directly, although I don't think that's a very > good argument for "am --check". Another is that "am" has preprocessing phase performed by mailsplit that deals with MIME garbage, which "apply" will totally choke on without even attempting to cope with. I h

Re: [Proposal] git am --check

2019-06-03 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:29 PM Christian Couder wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 7:38 PM Drew DeVault wrote: > > > > This flag would behave similarly to git apply --check, or in other words > > would exit with a nonzero status if the patch is not applicable without > > actually applying the patc

Re: [Proposal] git am --check

2019-06-03 Thread Christian Couder
On Sun, Jun 2, 2019 at 7:38 PM Drew DeVault wrote: > > This flag would behave similarly to git apply --check, or in other words > would exit with a nonzero status if the patch is not applicable without > actually applying the patch otherwise. `git am` uses the same code as `git apply` to apply pa

[Proposal] git am --check

2019-06-02 Thread Drew DeVault
This flag would behave similarly to git apply --check, or in other words would exit with a nonzero status if the patch is not applicable without actually applying the patch otherwise. Rationale: I'm working on an email client which has some git integration, and when you scroll over a patch I want

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-13 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Matthew DeVore wrote: > On 2019/05/09, at 11:00, Jonathan Tan wrote: >> - Supporting any combination of filter means that we have more to >> implement and test, especially if we want to support more filters in >> the future. In particular, the different filters (e.g. blob, tree) >> have d

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-13 Thread Matthew DeVore
> On 2019/05/09, at 11:00, Jonathan Tan wrote: > > Thanks for the numbers. Let me think about it some more, but I'm still > reluctant to introduce multiple filter support in the protocol and the > implementation for the following reasons: Correction to the original command - I was tweaking it

Re: Proposal: Remembering message IDs sent with git send-email

2019-05-09 Thread Drew DeVault
On 2019-05-09 11:51 AM, Emily Shaffer wrote: > I'm still not sure I see the value of the extra header proposed here. > I'd appreciate an explanation of how you think it would be used, Drew. I'm not just thinking about your run of the mill mail reader, but also mail readers which are aware of git a

Re: Proposal: Remembering message IDs sent with git send-email

2019-05-09 Thread Eric Wong
Drew DeVault wrote: > --in-reply-to=ask doesn't exist, that's what I'm looking to add. This > convenient storage mechanism is exactly what I'm talking about. Sorry > for the confusion. Using Net::NNTP to query NNTP servers using ->xover([recent-ish range]) to scan for Message-IDs and Subjects mat

Re: Proposal: Remembering message IDs sent with git send-email

2019-05-09 Thread Emily Shaffer
On Thu, May 09, 2019 at 12:50:25PM -0400, Drew DeVault wrote: > On 2019-05-08 5:19 PM, Emily Shaffer wrote: > > What I think might be useful (and what I was hoping you were going to > > talk about when I saw the subject line) would be if the Message-Id is > > conveniently stored during `git send-e

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-09 Thread Jonathan Tan
> > On 2019/05/07, at 11:34, Jonathan Tan wrote: > > > > To get an enumeration of available objects, don't you need to use only > > "blob:none"? Combining filters (once that's implemented) will get all > > objects only up to a certain depth. > > > > Combining "tree:" and "blob:none" would allow us

Re: Proposal: Remembering message IDs sent with git send-email

2019-05-09 Thread Drew DeVault
On 2019-05-08 5:19 PM, Emily Shaffer wrote: > What I think might be useful (and what I was hoping you were going to > talk about when I saw the subject line) would be if the Message-Id is > conveniently stored during `git send-email` on v1 and somehow saved in a > useful place in order to apply to

Re: Proposal: Remembering message IDs sent with git send-email

2019-05-08 Thread Emily Shaffer
On Wed, May 08, 2019 at 07:10:13PM -0400, Drew DeVault wrote: > I want to gather some thoughts about this. Say you've written a patch > series and are getting ready to send a -v2. If you set > --in-reply-to=ask, it'll show you a list of emails you've recently sent, > and their subject lines, and as

Proposal: Remembering message IDs sent with git send-email

2019-05-08 Thread Drew DeVault
I want to gather some thoughts about this. Say you've written a patch series and are getting ready to send a -v2. If you set --in-reply-to=ask, it'll show you a list of emails you've recently sent, and their subject lines, and ask you to pick one to use the message ID from. It'll set the In-Reply-T

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-07 Thread Matthew DeVore
> On 2019/05/07, at 11:34, Jonathan Tan wrote: > > To get an enumeration of available objects, don't you need to use only > "blob:none"? Combining filters (once that's implemented) will get all > objects only up to a certain depth. > > Combining "tree:" and "blob:none" would allow us to reduc

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-07 Thread Jonathan Tan
> > My main question is: we can get the same list of objects (in the form of > > tree objects) if we fetch with "blob:none" filter. Admittedly, we will > > get extra data (file names, etc.) - if the extra bandwidth saving is > > necessary, this should be called out. (And some of the savings will be

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-06 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Matthew DeVore wrote: > On 2019/05/06, at 12:46, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Ah, interesting. When this was discussed before, the proposal has been >> that the client can say "have" anyway. They don't have the commit and >> all referenced objects, but they

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-06 Thread Matthew DeVore
the client is a >>> partial clone. I'd like to refine and get some validation of my >>> approach before I start to write any code, so I've written a proposal >>> for anyone interested to review. Your comments would be appreciated. >> >> Thanks. Let

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-06 Thread Matthew DeVore
ion of my > > approach before I start to write any code, so I've written a proposal > > for anyone interested to review. Your comments would be appreciated. > > Thanks. Let me try to summarize: The issue is that, during a fetch, > normally the client can say "have"

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-06 Thread Jonathan Nieder
y >> approach before I start to write any code, so I've written a proposal >> for anyone interested to review. Your comments would be appreciated. > > Thanks. Let me try to summarize: The issue is that, during a fetch, > normally the client can say "have" to info

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-06 Thread Jonathan Tan
> I'm considering implementing a feature in the Git protocol which would > enable efficient and accurate object negotiation when the client is a > partial clone. I'd like to refine and get some validation of my > approach before I start to write any code, so I've writ

Re: Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-05-06 Thread Jonathan Nieder
rite any code, so I've written a proposal > for anyone interested to review. Your comments would be appreciated. Yay! Thanks for looking into this, and sorry I didn't respond sooner. I know the doc has a "use case" section, but I suppose I am not sure that I understand the use

Proposal: object negotiation for partial clones

2019-04-28 Thread Matthew DeVore
Hello, I'm considering implementing a feature in the Git protocol which would enable efficient and accurate object negotiation when the client is a partial clone. I'd like to refine and get some validation of my approach before I start to write any code, so I've written a prop

Re: [GSoC] [RFC] Proposal: Teach git stash to handle unmerged index entries.

2019-04-09 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > As to the design, it does not quite matter if you add four or more > separate trees to represent stage #[0123] entries in the index to > the already octopus merge commit that represents a stash entry ... I forgot that I was planning to expand on this part while writing t

Re: [GSoC] [RFC] Proposal: Teach git stash to handle unmerged index entries.

2019-04-09 Thread Junio C Hamano
Kapil Jain writes: > Plan to implement the project. > > Objective: > > Description: > > Implementation Idea: > > Relevant Discussions: > > Idea Execution Plan: Divided into 2 parts. Two things missing before implementation idea are design, and more importantly, the success criteria. What lets y

[GSoC] [RFC] Proposal: Teach git stash to handle unmerged index entries.

2019-04-09 Thread Kapil Jain
Plan to implement the project. Objective: Teach git stash to handle unmerged index entries. Description: When the index is unmerged, git stash refuses to do anything. That is unnecessary, though, as it could easily craft e.g. an octopus merge of the various stages. A subsequent git stash apply ca

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-08 Thread Torsten Bögershausen
On 2019-04-08 21:36, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote: > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:19 PM Philip Oakley wrote: >> >> Hi Matheus >> >> On 08/04/2019 18:04, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote: Another "32-bit problem" should also be expressly considered during the GSoC work because of the MS W

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-08 Thread Matheus Tavares Bernardino
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 4:19 PM Philip Oakley wrote: > > Hi Matheus > > On 08/04/2019 18:04, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote: > >> Another "32-bit problem" should also be expressly considered during the > >> GSoC work because of the MS Windows definition of uInt / long to be only > >> 32 bits, lea

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-08 Thread Philip Oakley
Hi Matheus On 08/04/2019 18:04, Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote: Another "32-bit problem" should also be expressly considered during the GSoC work because of the MS Windows definition of uInt / long to be only 32 bits, leading to much of the Git code failing on the Git for Windows port and on t

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-08 Thread Matheus Tavares Bernardino
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 6:26 AM Philip Oakley wrote: > > On 08/04/2019 02:23, Duy Nguyen wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder > > wrote: > >>> Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly store > >>> objects (blobs, trees, commits, etc.) in packfiles[2]. These files are >

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-08 Thread Matheus Tavares Bernardino
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 7:52 PM Christian Couder wrote: > > Hi Matheus > > On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 10:48 PM Matheus Tavares Bernardino > wrote: > > > > This is my proposal for GSoC with the subject "Make pack access code > > thread-safe". > > Thank

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-08 Thread Matheus Tavares Bernardino
gt; > These windows are actually for reading. We used to just mmap the whole > > > pack file in the early days but that was impossible for 4+ GB packs on > > > 32-bit platforms, which was one of the reasons, I think, that sliding > > > windows were added, to map just the

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-08 Thread Matheus Tavares Bernardino
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:32 AM Duy Nguyen wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:23 AM Duy Nguyen wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder > > wrote: > > > > Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly store > > > > objects (blobs, trees, commits, etc.) in packfiles[2]. T

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-08 Thread Philip Oakley
On 08/04/2019 02:23, Duy Nguyen wrote: On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder wrote: Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly store objects (blobs, trees, commits, etc.) in packfiles[2]. These files are created by[3]: 1. listing objects; 2. sorting the list with some good heuri

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-07 Thread Christian Couder
st the parts we want to read. > > To clarify (I think I see why you mentioned pack creation now), there > are actually two window concepts. core.packedGitWindowSize is about > reading pack files. pack.window is for generating pack files. The > second window should already be thread-

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-07 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:23 AM Duy Nguyen wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder > wrote: > > > Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly store > > > objects (blobs, trees, commits, etc.) in packfiles[2]. These files are > > > created by[3]: > > > > > > 1. listing object

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-07 Thread Duy Nguyen
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:52 AM Christian Couder wrote: > > Git has a very optimized mechanism to compactly store > > objects (blobs, trees, commits, etc.) in packfiles[2]. These files are > > created by[3]: > > > > 1. listing objects; > > 2. sorting the list with some good heuristics; > > 3. trave

Re: [GSoC][RFC v3] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands

2019-04-07 Thread Christian Couder
Hi Rohit, On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 2:17 PM Rohit Ashiwal wrote: > > On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:15:30 +0200 Christian Couder > wrote: > > > As we are close to the deadline (April 9th) for proposal submissions, > > I think it's a good idea to already upload your draft pro

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-07 Thread Christian Couder
Hi Matheus On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 10:48 PM Matheus Tavares Bernardino wrote: > > This is my proposal for GSoC with the subject "Make pack access code > thread-safe". Thanks! > I'm late in schedule but I would like to ask for your > comments on it. Any feedb

[GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Make pack access code thread-safe

2019-04-07 Thread Matheus Tavares Bernardino
Hi, everyone This is my proposal for GSoC with the subject "Make pack access code thread-safe". I'm late in schedule but I would like to ask for your comments on it. Any feedback will be highly appreciated. The "rendered" version can be seen here: https://d

Re: [GSoC][RFC v3] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands

2019-04-07 Thread Rohit Ashiwal
Hey Chris! On Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:15:30 +0200 Christian Couder wrote: > As we are close to the deadline (April 9th) for proposal submissions, > I think it's a good idea to already upload your draft proposal on the > GSoC site. I think you will be able to upload newer vers

Re: [GSoC][RFC v3] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands

2019-04-07 Thread Christian Couder
Hi Rohit, On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 11:32 PM Rohit Ashiwal wrote: > > Here is one more iteration of my draft proposal[1]. RFC. Nice, thanks for iterating on this! As we are close to the deadline (April 9th) for proposal submissions, I think it's a good idea to already upload your dra

Re: Proposal

2019-04-06 Thread brestnic...@unwe.bg
I have a deal for you

[GSoC][RFC v3] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands

2019-04-05 Thread Rohit Ashiwal
Hiya Here is one more iteration of my draft proposal[1]. RFC. Thanks Rohit [1]: https://gist.github.com/r1walz/5588d11065d5231ee451c0136400610e -- >8 -- # Improve consistency of sequencer commands ## About

Re: [GSoC][RFC] proposal: convert git-submodule to builtin script

2019-04-04 Thread Christian Couder
Hi, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:34 PM Khalid Ali wrote: > > My name is Khalid Ali and I am looking to convert the git-submodule to > a builtin C script. The link below contains my first proposal draft > [1] and my microproject is at [2]. My main concern is that my second > task

Re: [GSoC][RFC] proposal: convert git-submodule to builtin script

2019-04-03 Thread Khalid Ali
First of all, thank you so much for the detailed feedback. I wasn't sure how much to include in the proposal, but I see it still needs a lot of work. > When you talk about "Convert each main task in git-submodule into a C > function." and "If certain functionality

Re: [GSoC][RFC] proposal: convert git-submodule to builtin script

2019-04-03 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi, On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Khalid Ali wrote: > My name is Khalid Ali and I am looking to convert the git-submodule to > a builtin C script. The link below contains my first proposal draft > [1] and my microproject is at [2]. My main concern is that my second > task is not verbose enou

[GSoC][RFC] proposal: convert git-submodule to builtin script

2019-04-02 Thread Khalid Ali
Hi, My name is Khalid Ali and I am looking to convert the git-submodule to a builtin C script. The link below contains my first proposal draft [1] and my microproject is at [2]. My main concern is that my second task is not verbose enough. I am not sure if I should add a specific breakdown of

Investment Proposal.

2019-03-28 Thread Saleh Hussien Consultancy
Greetings, We are consultancy firm situated in Bahrain currently looking to finance new or existing projects in any industry. Currently we are sourcing for investment opportunities for our review and consideration and we provide financial and strategic advisory services to growing companies an

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands

2019-03-23 Thread Rohit Ashiwal
[0]), we were trying to > > integrate this on git-for-windows first. > > Keeping warning in mind, I discussed this project with Rafael and he > > suggested > > (with a little bit uncertainty in mind) that I should work on implementing > > a git-diff flag that generates a patch

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands

2019-03-23 Thread Rohit Ashiwal
Hi Christian On 2019-03-23 22:17 UTC Christian Couder <> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:12 PM Rohit Ashiwal > wrote: > > > > Hey People > > > > I am Rohit Ashiwal and here my first draft of the proposal for the project > > titled: `Improve consist

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands

2019-03-23 Thread Elijah Newren
Hi Rohit! On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 8:12 AM Rohit Ashiwal wrote: > > Hey People > > I am Rohit Ashiwal and here my first draft of the proposal for the project > titled: `Improve consistency of sequencer commands' this summer. I need your > feedback and more than that I n

Re: [GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands

2019-03-23 Thread Christian Couder
Hi Rohit, On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 4:12 PM Rohit Ashiwal wrote: > > Hey People > > I am Rohit Ashiwal and here my first draft of the proposal for the project > titled: `Improve consistency of sequencer commands' this summer. I need your > feedback and more than that I n

[GSoC][RFC] Proposal: Improve consistency of sequencer commands

2019-03-22 Thread Rohit Ashiwal
Hey People I am Rohit Ashiwal and here my first draft of the proposal for the project titled: `Improve consistency of sequencer commands' this summer. I need your feedback and more than that I need help to improve the timeline of this proposal since it looks very weak. Basically, it lack

Re: Proposal: Output should push to different servers in parallel

2019-02-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason writes: > This seems like a reasonable idea, until such time as someone submits > patches to implement this in git you can do this with some invocation of > GNU parallel -k, i.e. operate on N remotes in parallel, and use the -k > option to buffer up all their output and pr

Re: Proposal: Output should push to different servers in parallel

2019-02-07 Thread Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
On Wed, Feb 06 2019, Victor Porton wrote: > I experienced a slowdown in Git pushing when I push to more than one server. > > I propose: > > Run push to several servers in parallel. > > Not to mix the output, nevertheless serialize the output, that is for > example cache the output of the second

Proposal: Output should push to different servers in parallel

2019-02-06 Thread Victor Porton
I experienced a slowdown in Git pushing when I push to more than one server. I propose: Run push to several servers in parallel. Not to mix the output, nevertheless serialize the output, that is for example cache the output of the second server push and start to output it immediately after th

Proposal

2018-11-12 Thread SGM John Dailey
Hello , My name is Sgt Major John Dailey. I am here in Afghanistan , I came upon a project I think we can work together on. I and my partner (1st Lt. Daniel Farkas ) have the sum of $15 Million United State Dollars which we got from a Crude Oil Deal in Iraq before he was killed by an explosion wh

Proposal

2018-09-19 Thread Ms.Lev
I wish to discuss a proposal with you, please contact me via email for more details immediately.

Greetings in the name of God, Business proposal in God we trust

2018-07-26 Thread Mrs, Suran Yoda
Greetings in the name of God Dear Friend Greetings in the name of God,please let this not sound strange to you for my only surviving lawyer who would have done this died early this year.I prayed and got your email id from your country guestbook. I am Mrs Suran Yoda from London,I am 72 years old,

Proposal

2018-07-15 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you,i asked before and i still await your positive response thanks.

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you i asked before and i still await your positive response thanks

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you i asked before and i still await your positive response thanks

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you i asked before and i still await your positive response thanks

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you i asked before and i still await your positive response thanks

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you i asked before and i still await your positive response thanks

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you i asked before and i still await your positive response thanks

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you i asked before and i still await your positive response thanks

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you.

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you.

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you.

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you.

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you.

Proposal

2018-07-12 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
Hello I have a business proposal of mutual benefits i would like to discuss with you.

Business Proposal

2018-07-05 Thread BRENDA WILSON
I am Sgt.Brenda Wilson, originally from Lake Jackson Texas USA.I personally made a special research and I came across your information. I am presently writing this mail to you from U.S Military base Kabul Afghanistan I have a secured business proposal for you. Reply for more details via my

Proposal

2018-06-07 Thread Mr. Fawaz KhE. Al Saleh
-- Good day, i know you do not know me personally but i have checked your profile and i see generosity in you, There's an urgent offer attach to your name here in the office of Mr. Fawaz KhE. Al Saleh Member of the Board of Directors, Kuveyt Türk Participation Bank (Turkey) and head of pri

BUSINESS INTEREST/ PROPOSAL

2018-06-04 Thread ZHAO DONG
Hello RE:BUSINESS INQUIRY/ PROPOSAL How are you doing today, i hope this mail finds you in a good and convenient position! My name is ZHAO DONG. I am the senior manager for Procurement, Hong Kong Refining Company (Sinopec Group Inc) I have been mandated to source crude oil from Libya for

Proposal

2018-06-02 Thread Miss Victoria Mehmet
-- Hello I have been trying to contact you. Did you get my business proposal? Best Regards, Miss.Victoria Mehmet

Lucrative Business Proposal

2018-06-02 Thread Adrien Saif
-- Dear Friend, I would like to discuss a very important issue with you. I am writing to find out if this is your valid email. Please, let me know if this email is valid Kind regards Adrien Saif Attorney to Quatif Group of Companies

Lucrative Business Proposal

2018-06-02 Thread Adrien Saif
-- Dear Friend, I would like to discuss a very important issue with you. I am writing to find out if this is your valid email. Please, let me know if this email is valid Kind regards Adrien Saif Attorney to Quatif Group of Companies

Proposal

2018-05-28 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello I have been trying to contact you. Did you get my business proposal? Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turke

Proposal

2018-05-28 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello I have been trying to contact you. Did you get my business proposal? Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turke

Proposal

2018-05-27 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello I have been trying to contact you. Did you get my business proposal? Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turke

Proposal

2018-05-26 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-23 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-22 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-21 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Business Proposal

2018-05-21 Thread Alan austin
Hello, I am Mr. Alan Austin, I am currently working with Credit suisse Bank London. I saw your contact during my private search and I have a deep believe that you will be very honest, committed and capable of assisting in this business venture. I am an account officer to late Dr. Manzoor Hassan

Proposal

2018-05-20 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-20 Thread Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-16 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-16 Thread Miss Zeliha Omer Faruk
Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-13 Thread Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-13 Thread Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-11 Thread Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-09 Thread Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-09 Thread Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

Proposal

2018-05-09 Thread Zeliha Omer Faruk
-- Hello Greetings to you please i have a business proposal for you contact me for more detailes asap thanks. Best Regards, Miss.Zeliha ömer faruk Esentepe Mahallesi Büyükdere Caddesi Kristal Kule Binasi No:215 Sisli - Istanbul, Turkey

  1   2   3   4   5   >