Re: Q: do people compile with NO_FNMATCH on OpenBSD 5.2?

2012-12-20 Thread Greg Troxel
[mkstemp truncating output on error] diff --git c/wrapper.c w/wrapper.c index 68739aa..a066e2e 100644 --- c/wrapper.c +++ w/wrapper.c @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ int xmkstemp(char *template) int saved_errno = errno; const char *nonrelative_template; -

Q: do people compile with NO_FNMATCH on OpenBSD 5.2?

2012-12-18 Thread Junio C Hamano
I seem to get a failure from git ls-files a* in t/t-basic.sh if I link with platform's fnmatch(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Q: do people compile with NO_FNMATCH on OpenBSD 5.2?

2012-12-18 Thread Greg Troxel
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes: I seem to get a failure from git ls-files a* in t/t-basic.sh if I link with platform's fnmatch(). Not what you asked, but on NetBSD 5.1, libc fnmatch is used, and with git 1.8.0.1 that test passes. This prompted me to look at the rest of

Re: Q: do people compile with NO_FNMATCH on OpenBSD 5.2?

2012-12-18 Thread Junio C Hamano
Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com writes: *** t0070-fundamental.sh *** ok 1 - character classes (isspace, isalpha etc.) not ok - 2 mktemp to nonexistent directory prints filename # # test_must_fail test-mktemp doesnotexist/testXX 2err # grep