On do, 2012-12-20 at 10:30 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Which platforms that are long-term-maintained by their vendors still
pin their Python at 2.4.X?
RHEL 5.x and its clones still use python 2.4. It is supported by red hat
until at least 2017 (though end of production phase two, Q1 2014,
Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de writes:
We have a working 2.4.2 for HP-NonStop and some major problems getting
2.7.3 to work.
I do not think a platform that stops at 2.4.2 instead of going to
higher 2.4.X series deserves to be called long term maintained by
their vendors. It
From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2012 7:28 PM
To: Joachim Schmitz
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Python version auditing followup
Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de writes:
We have a working 2.4.2 for HP-NonStop and some major
e...@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond) writes:
That was the first of three patches I have promised. In order to do
the next one, which will be a development guidelines recommend
compatibility back to some specific version X, I need a policy
decision. How do we set X?
I don't think X can be
Junio C Hamano wrote:
e...@thyrsus.com (Eric S. Raymond) writes:
That was the first of three patches I have promised. In order to do
the next one, which will be a development guidelines recommend
compatibility back to some specific version X, I need a policy
decision. How do we set X?
I
Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
I personally would think 2.6 is recent enough. Which platforms that
are long-term-maintained by their vendors still pin their Python at
2.4.X? 2.4.6 was in 2008 that was source only, 2.4.4 was in late
2006 that was the
From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:39 PM
To: Joachim Schmitz
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Python version auditing followup
Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de writes:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
I personally would think 2.6
7 matches
Mail list logo
