RE: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2012, #05; Fri, 14)
From: Joachim Schmitz [mailto:j...@schmitz-digital.de] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 7:15 PM To: 'Junio C Hamano' Cc: 'git@vger.kernel.org' Subject: RE: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2012, #05; Fri, 14) From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 7:01 PM To: Joachim Schmitz Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2012, #05; Fri, 14) Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de writes: Junio C Hamano wrote: I think we can start thinking about feature freeze once the topics in 'next' that are scheduled to graduate to 'master' already are fully cooked. For any late-coming topic, there always is the next cycle ;-) I've not hear anything about my poll patches and I'd really like them to into 1.8.x. I've seen some patches on poll posted, were discussed and had threads titled Re: [PATCH] But I didn't see a rerolled [PATCH v2 n/m] ... series that states that it is a rerolled hopefully final version that addresses all the points that were brought up during the discussion that need to be addressed. I do not necessarily follow all the minute details of all discussion threads. For this particular series, I not know which ones of your poll patches turned out to be unneeded, which ones turned out to be fine as posted originally and which ones needed updating. There were several iterations up to [PATCH v4 n/4] and only one foreign comment to it (and to some commented code) and one self- comment about the order of patches, but none about technical correctness, none that I remember at least. I can post a v5 series which will Actually v6, seems I got myself confused in what I send already, one part of the series was on v5 already, aother on v4 and yet another still on v3. - move compat/win32/poll.[ch] to compat/poll/ and adjust Makefile - #ifdef some WIN32 specific #include (should this be done in one step with the above?) Decided for 2 patches - fix the 2 bugs in poll.c just like they got fixed in gnulib's version (would you want this in one or two steps?) Likewise Bye, Jojo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2012, #05; Fri, 14)
Junio C Hamano wrote: I think we can start thinking about feature freeze once the topics in 'next' that are scheduled to graduate to 'master' already are fully cooked. For any late-coming topic, there always is the next cycle ;-) I've not hear anything about my poll patches and I'd really like them to into 1.8.x. If and when they did, there's another small patch to fully support HP NonStop (some adjustment to git-compat-util.h with #ifdef __TANDEM and a NonStop section in Makefile, so nothing that should have any bad impact on others), which I too would like to get in 1.8.x Bye, Jojo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
RE: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2012, #05; Fri, 14)
From: Junio C Hamano [mailto:gits...@pobox.com] Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2012 7:01 PM To: Joachim Schmitz Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2012, #05; Fri, 14) Joachim Schmitz j...@schmitz-digital.de writes: Junio C Hamano wrote: I think we can start thinking about feature freeze once the topics in 'next' that are scheduled to graduate to 'master' already are fully cooked. For any late-coming topic, there always is the next cycle ;-) I've not hear anything about my poll patches and I'd really like them to into 1.8.x. I've seen some patches on poll posted, were discussed and had threads titled Re: [PATCH] But I didn't see a rerolled [PATCH v2 n/m] ... series that states that it is a rerolled hopefully final version that addresses all the points that were brought up during the discussion that need to be addressed. I do not necessarily follow all the minute details of all discussion threads. For this particular series, I not know which ones of your poll patches turned out to be unneeded, which ones turned out to be fine as posted originally and which ones needed updating. There were several iterations up to [PATCH v4 n/4] and only one foreign comment to it (and to some commented code) and one self-comment about the order of patches, but none about technical correctness, none that I remember at least. I can post a v5 series which will - move compat/win32/poll.[ch] to compat/poll/ and adjust Makefile - #ifdef some WIN32 specific #include (should this be done in one step with the above?) - fix the 2 bugs in poll.c just like they got fixed in gnulib's version (would you want this in one or two steps?) Bye, Jojo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe git in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
