Junio C Hamano writes:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>
>>> My reading of the earlier parts of the series is that Linus wanted
>>> us never dwim "for-upstream" to "tags/for-upstream" or any other ref
>>> that happens to point at the same commit as for-upstream you have.
>>> The changes done for
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>> My reading of the earlier parts of the series is that Linus wanted
>> us never dwim "for-upstream" to "tags/for-upstream" or any other ref
>> that happens to point at the same commit as for-upstream you have.
>> The changes done for that purpose covered various cas
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:13:18PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano writes:
>
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> >
> >> looks like pull requests with signed git got broken in git master:
> >>
> >> [mst@robin qemu]$ /usr/bin/git --version
> >> git version 1.8.3.1
> >> [mst@robin qemu
Junio C Hamano writes:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
>
>> looks like pull requests with signed git got broken in git master:
>>
>> [mst@robin qemu]$ /usr/bin/git --version
>> git version 1.8.3.1
>> [mst@robin qemu]$ git --version
>> git version 2.0.0.rc1.18.gac53fc6.dirty
>> [mst@robin qemu]$
"Michael S. Tsirkin" writes:
> looks like pull requests with signed git got broken in git master:
>
> [mst@robin qemu]$ /usr/bin/git --version
> git version 1.8.3.1
> [mst@robin qemu]$ git --version
> git version 2.0.0.rc1.18.gac53fc6.dirty
> [mst@robin qemu]$
> [mst@robin qemu]$ /usr/bin/git re
5 matches
Mail list logo