On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:46:19PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:08:57AM +0100, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
Do you have any idea how does github understand that is a bug and
fixes it automatically?
(I'm saying this because on Github the date is correct).
I looked into
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 08:23:02AM +0200, Dennis Kaarsemaker wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:46:19PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:08:57AM +0100, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
Do you have any idea how does github understand that is a bug and
fixes it automatically?
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:08:57AM +0100, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
Do you have any idea how does github understand that is a bug and
fixes it automatically?
(I'm saying this because on Github the date is correct).
I looked into this. The dates you see on GitHub's web UI are actually
parsed by
Jeff,
Do you have any idea how does github understand that is a bug and
fixes it automatically?
(I'm saying this because on Github the date is correct).
Cumprimentos,
Rodrigo Fernandes
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Rodrigo Fernandes rtfrodr...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff,
I have no idea what was
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Rodrigo Fernandes rtfrodr...@gmail.com wrote:
I get an empty response on the date field, but since pretty has `%ad`
it should follow the --date and return the date even if wrong.
...
I tried to check the source code but have no idea where to start,
maybe if
On do, 2014-05-29 at 11:29 +0100, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
The problem happens when I try to get a pretty log for a commit with a
wrong date.
The commit is:
===
$ git cat-file commit e9dddaf24c9de45d9b4efdf38eff7c30eb200f48
tree d63aeb159635cb231e191505a95a129a3b4a7b38
parent
Dennis I think that could be an improvement.
Duy, can you point me where is the date print from normal `git log` or
`git show` so I can compare?
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Dennis Kaarsemaker
den...@kaarsemaker.net wrote:
On do, 2014-05-29 at 11:29 +0100, Rodrigo Fernandes wrote:
The
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Rodrigo Fernandes rtfrodr...@gmail.com wrote:
Duy, can you point me where is the date print from normal `git log` or
`git show` so I can compare?
It's the same function, show_date() in date.c.
--
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 05:50:56PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Rodrigo Fernandes rtfrodr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I get an empty response on the date field, but since pretty has `%ad`
it should follow the --date and return the date even if wrong.
...
I
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
...
to at least make --format date output consistent with the rest of git
(and to make %at consistent with %ad and --date=raw). That still
doesn't address Rodrigo's concern, though (we would print 0 +).
For that, we would want on top:
1. Teach
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:57:15AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jeff King p...@peff.net writes:
...
to at least make --format date output consistent with the rest of git
(and to make %at consistent with %ad and --date=raw). That still
doesn't address Rodrigo's concern, though (we would
Jeff,
I have no idea what was the tool. The repo is not mine. I found the
problem when I was doing some tests and the commit parsing was failing
on that repo.
Cumprimentos,
Rodrigo Fernandes
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Jeff King p...@peff.net wrote:
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 11:57:15AM
12 matches
Mail list logo
