Wolfgang Denk [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anybody any information if SourceForge is going to provide git /
cogito / ... for the projects they host? I asked SF, and they openend
a new Feature Request (item #1252867); the message I received sounded
as if I was the first person on the planet
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
This is somewhat off topic here, so I apologize, but I didn't know
any better place to ask:
Has anybody any information if SourceForge is going to provide git /
cogito / ... for the projects they host? I asked SF, and they openend
a new Feature
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 04:46:34PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
This is somewhat off topic here, so I apologize, but I didn't know
any better place to ask:
Has anybody any information if SourceForge is going to provide git /
cogito / ...
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
This is somewhat off topic here, so I apologize, but I didn't know
any better place to ask:
Has anybody any information if SourceForge is going to provide git /
cogito / ... for the projects they host? I asked SF, and they openend
a new Feature Request (item #1252867);
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
The git architecture makes the central server less important, and it's
easy to run your own. Also, kernel.org is providing space to a set of
Yes, cou can - but for a popular project like U-Boot in our case you
don't really want to ;-)
people with
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
The git architecture makes the central server less important, and it's
easy to run your own.
On the other hand:
- the git architecture is admirably suited to an _untrusted_ central
server, ie exactly the SourceForge kind of setup. I realize
I don't think he wants sourceforge to host git, I think he'd like
sourceforge to provide access to source trees via git, instead of
cvs. Read that as, I want to do:
Correct, that's what I am looking for. My hope is that if enough
people ask SF might actually provide such a service.
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
And it's possible that git usage won't expand all that much either. But
quite frankly, I think git is a lot better than CVS (or even SVN) by now,
and I wouldn't be surprised if it started getting some use outside of the
git-only and kernel projects
- the git architecture is admirably suited to an _untrusted_ central
server, ie exactly the SourceForge kind of setup. I realize that the
Definitely. And beyond that too. Using SF for CVS means that when SF's
CVS service is down (often enough) you can't commit (or even fscking
diff) until
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Yes, developers can just merge with each other directly
I take it that you mean an exchange of patches that does not depend on
having public repos. What are the mechanisms available on that front,
other than patchbombs?
Just have a shared
10 matches
Mail list logo
