Stefan Beller writes:
> On 07/29/2013 07:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Stefan Beller writes:
>>
>>> So recently Junio released -rc0. Is that a reason to not
>>> send out patches, which do not do bugfixes? So the following
>>> commit for example doesn't fix a bug nor does it add a feature.
>>
On 07/29/2013 08:11 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> As of b04ba2bb4 OPTION_BOOLEAN was deprecated.
>
> The primary purpose of b04ba2bb (parse-options: deprecate
> OPT_BOOLEAN, 2011-09-27) is to deprecate OPT_BOOLEAN(), which was
> hard to use correctly.
>
> OPT_BOOLEAN()
Stefan Beller writes:
> As of b04ba2bb4 OPTION_BOOLEAN was deprecated.
The primary purpose of b04ba2bb (parse-options: deprecate
OPT_BOOLEAN, 2011-09-27) is to deprecate OPT_BOOLEAN(), which was
hard to use correctly.
OPT_BOOLEAN() is not touched at all with this patch, it seems. Do
they want
On 07/29/2013 07:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Stefan Beller writes:
>
>> So recently Junio released -rc0. Is that a reason to not
>> send out patches, which do not do bugfixes? So the following
>> commit for example doesn't fix a bug nor does it add a feature.
>> Is it fine to send out such ki
Stefan Beller writes:
> So recently Junio released -rc0. Is that a reason to not
> send out patches, which do not do bugfixes? So the following
> commit for example doesn't fix a bug nor does it add a feature.
> Is it fine to send out such kind of commits during the -rc
> times or better wait fo
5 matches
Mail list logo