On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:48 AM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Showing the tracking information for all the branches takes significant
amount of time. The user might not want that. The --no-show-tracking
option allows that.
BTW. I ideally I would switch around so -v has
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Showing the tracking information for all the branches takes significant
amount of time. The user might not want that. The --no-show-tracking
option allows that.
Or we could cache the information somewhere in
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Felipe Contreras
felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote:
Showing the tracking information for all the branches takes significant
amount of time. The user might not want that. The --no-show-tracking
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 16.05.2013 09:48:
Showing the tracking information for all the branches takes significant
amount of time. The user might not want that. The --no-show-tracking
option allows that.
I really like the idea of allowing that - not just because I've
suggested so
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 16.05.2013 09:48:
Showing the tracking information for all the branches takes significant
amount of time. The user might not want that. The --no-show-tracking
option allows
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 16.05.2013 10:09:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:00 AM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
Felipe Contreras venit, vidit, dixit 16.05.2013 09:48:
Showing the tracking information for all the branches takes significant
amount of time. The user
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
I feel, though, that we're really exploding our option and config realm.
For git branch in list mode, we are already able to stack -v, i.e.
-v and -vv do different things. How about maybe adding -vvv and
Duy Nguyen venit, vidit, dixit 16.05.2013 10:23:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
I feel, though, that we're really exploding our option and config realm.
For git branch in list mode, we are already able to stack -v, i.e.
-v and -vv do
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
What if I want something in - except some in -vv? I think to avoid
option explosion, maybe we can adopt --pretty=format:xxx from git
log and let the user decideswhat (and how) to display. pretty code
learns
Duy Nguyen pclo...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Michael J Gruber
g...@drmicha.warpmail.net wrote:
What if I want something in - except some in -vv? I think to avoid
option explosion, maybe we can adopt --pretty=format:xxx from git
log and let the user decideswhat
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
*1* indented because this is dependent of @{u}; showing ahead/behind
without showing @{u} would not make any sense.
That's what 'git branch -v' does.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com wrote:
*1* indented because this is dependent of @{u}; showing ahead/behind
without showing @{u} would not make any sense.
That's what 'git branch -v' does.
OK,
12 matches
Mail list logo
