Re: [PATCH] doc: format-patch: don't use origin as a branch name

2014-08-01 Thread Philip Oakley
From: "Junio C Hamano" Jonathan Nieder writes: Philip Oakley wrote: Historically (5 Nov 2005 v0.99.9-46-g28ffb89) the git-format-patch used 'origin' as the upstream branch name. This is now used to name the remote. Use the more modern 'master' as the branch name. Would 'origin/master' m

Re: [PATCH] doc: format-patch: don't use origin as a branch name

2014-08-01 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jonathan Nieder writes: > Philip Oakley wrote: > >> Historically (5 Nov 2005 v0.99.9-46-g28ffb89) the git-format-patch used >> 'origin' as the upstream branch name. This is now used to name the remote. >> Use the more modern 'master' as the branch name. > > Would 'origin/master' make sense? It w

Re: [PATCH] doc: format-patch: don't use origin as a branch name

2014-08-01 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Philip Oakley wrote: > Historically (5 Nov 2005 v0.99.9-46-g28ffb89) the git-format-patch used > 'origin' as the upstream branch name. This is now used to name the remote. > Use the more modern 'master' as the branch name. Would 'origin/master' make sense? Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from