jorge-juan.garcia-gar...@ensimag.imag.fr wrote:
The format of email list handled is pretty basic for now:
$ git send-email --to='Foo f...@example.com, b...@example.com'
We thought it would be nice to have a first-step version which works
before handling more complex ones such as:
Le 2013-06-18 12:12, Ramkumar Ramachandra a écrit :
jorge-juan.garcia-gar...@ensimag.imag.fr wrote:
The format of email list handled is pretty basic for now:
$ git send-email --to='Foo f...@example.com,
b...@example.com'
We thought it would be nice to have a first-step version which
Mathieu Liénard--Mayor wrote:
Is this a regression? I can't send emails to a recipient whose name
contains a comma?
It is not. Previously the input would be considered incorrect:
Right. It dies with
Comma in --to entry: ...
This artificial limitation is imposed by 79ee555b (Check and
+sub split_email_list {
+my(@list) = @_;
+my @tmp;
+my @emails;
+ for (my $i = 0; $i = $#list; $i++) {
+ if ($list[$i] =~ /,/) {
+ @emails = split(/,/, $list[$i]);
+ } else {
+ @emails = $list[$i];
+ }
+
jorge-juan.garcia-gar...@ensimag.imag.fr wrote:
diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
index 9f46f22..87641bc 100755
--- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
+++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
@@ -1349,4 +1349,39 @@ test_expect_success $PREREQ
'sendemail.aliasfile=~/.mailrc' '
grep
Le 2013-06-18 12:47, Ramkumar Ramachandra a écrit :
jorge-juan.garcia-gar...@ensimag.imag.fr wrote:
diff --git a/t/t9001-send-email.sh b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
index 9f46f22..87641bc 100755
--- a/t/t9001-send-email.sh
+++ b/t/t9001-send-email.sh
@@ -1349,4 +1349,39 @@ test_expect_success $PREREQ
jorge-juan.garcia-gar...@ensimag.imag.fr wrote:
+sub split_email_list {
+my(@list) = @_;
+my @tmp;
+my @emails;
+ for (my $i = 0; $i = $#list; $i++) {
+ if ($list[$i] =~ /,/) {
+ @emails = split(/,/, $list[$i]);
+ } else {
+
Mathieu Liénard--Mayor wrote:
Shouldn't
$ git send-email --cc 'f...@example.com' --cc 'b...@example.com'
and
$ git send-email --cc 'f...@example.com, b...@example.com'
have the exact same effect ?
Ah. Perhaps it would be clearer to check the headers directly like in
the other tests?
--
Ramkumar Ramachandra artag...@gmail.com writes:
Mathieu Liénard--Mayor wrote:
Shouldn't
$ git send-email --cc 'f...@example.com' --cc 'b...@example.com'
and
$ git send-email --cc 'f...@example.com, b...@example.com'
have the exact same effect ?
Ah. Perhaps it would be clearer to
jorge-juan.garcia-gar...@ensimag.imag.fr writes:
From: Jorge Juan Garcia Garcia jorge-juan.garcia-gar...@ensimag.imag.fr
Make it so that we can use a list of email in flags
instead of having to use one flag per email address.
The format of email list handled is pretty basic for now:
Junio C Hamano gits...@pobox.com writes:
Doesn't
git send-email --to='Foo f...@example.com' --to='b...@example.com'
work? If it does, I do not see much point of this change. If you
are starting from two pieces of information, why combine it into
one, only have the program to split
11 matches
Mail list logo
