Is this safe? Today branch.c::create_branch
checks that the argument
> to e.g. --set-upstream-to is either in
refs/heads/* or the image of
> some remote, but what is making sure that remains
true tomorrow?
>
> So if changing this, I would be happier if the
"if" condition were
> still (!remot
Hi,
Nemina Amarasinghe wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nemina Amarasinghe
The above is a place to explain why this is a good change. For example:
When it prints a message indicating what it has done,
install_branch_config() treats the (!remote_is_branch && origin)
and (!remote
2 matches
Mail list logo
