On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote:
When update-cache --refresh replaces an existing cache entry
with a new one, it forgets to free the original.
I've seen this patch now three times, and it's been wrong every single
time. Maybe we should add a comment?
That active-cache entry you
LT == Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LT I've seen this patch now three times, and it's been wrong every single
LT time. Maybe we should add a comment?
I found out the previous two just after I sent it out. Sorry
about that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
2 matches
Mail list logo
