Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
It would be pretty annoying to spend a lot of time fetching a big pack,
only to have the fetch fail because one reference out of many couldn't
be updated. This would force the user to download the entire pack
again,...
Is that really true?
On 05/06/2014 08:40 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes:
It would be pretty annoying to spend a lot of time fetching a big pack,
only to have the fetch fail because one reference out of many couldn't
be updated. This would force the user to download the
On 04/22/2014 08:45 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote:
This change is based on the previous ref transaction patches.
This is sent as a separate patch series since it implements a lot more
non-trivial changes to the behaviour than the previous patches and thus can
use more detailed review.
Update
3 matches
Mail list logo