Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use ref transactions for fetch

2014-05-06 Thread Junio C Hamano
Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes: It would be pretty annoying to spend a lot of time fetching a big pack, only to have the fetch fail because one reference out of many couldn't be updated. This would force the user to download the entire pack again,... Is that really true?

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use ref transactions for fetch

2014-05-06 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 05/06/2014 08:40 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: Michael Haggerty mhag...@alum.mit.edu writes: It would be pretty annoying to spend a lot of time fetching a big pack, only to have the fetch fail because one reference out of many couldn't be updated. This would force the user to download the

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use ref transactions for fetch

2014-05-05 Thread Michael Haggerty
On 04/22/2014 08:45 PM, Ronnie Sahlberg wrote: This change is based on the previous ref transaction patches. This is sent as a separate patch series since it implements a lot more non-trivial changes to the behaviour than the previous patches and thus can use more detailed review. Update