David Turner writes:
>> I am not convinced that doing an equivalent of write-tree when you
>> switch branches is the right approach in the first place. You will
>> eventually write it out as a tree, and having a relatively undamaged
>> cache-tree will help you when you do so, but spending the cy
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 13:15 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Turner writes:
>
> > When git checkout checks out a branch, create or update the
> > cache-tree so that subsequent operations are faster.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Turner
> > ---
> > builtin/checkout.c| 8
> > cac
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 14:03 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> David Turner writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 06:16 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> >> diff --git a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh b/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
> >> index 6c33e28..7c60675 100755
> >> --- a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
> >> +++ b/t/t00
David Turner writes:
> When git checkout checks out a branch, create or update the
> cache-tree so that subsequent operations are faster.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Turner
> ---
Could you number your patches e.g. [PATCH v4 1/3] and/or summarize
below the three-dash line what got updated since the
David Turner writes:
> On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 06:16 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>> diff --git a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh b/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
>> index 6c33e28..7c60675 100755
>> --- a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
>> +++ b/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
>> @@ -85,9 +85,22 @@ test_expect_success 'reset --har
David Turner writes:
> When git checkout checks out a branch, create or update the
> cache-tree so that subsequent operations are faster.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Turner
> ---
> builtin/checkout.c| 8
> cache-tree.c | 5 +++--
> t/t0090-cache-tree.sh | 15 ++-
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 06:16 +0200, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
> diff --git a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh b/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
> index 6c33e28..7c60675 100755
> --- a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
> +++ b/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
> @@ -85,9 +85,22 @@ test_expect_success 'reset --hard without index gives
> cache
diff --git a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh b/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
index 6c33e28..7c60675 100755
--- a/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
+++ b/t/t0090-cache-tree.sh
@@ -85,9 +85,22 @@ test_expect_success 'reset --hard without index gives
cache-tree' '
test_shallow_cache_tree
'
-test_expect_failure 'check
Duy Nguyen writes:
> I wonder if we should do this in !opts->force code path only. In the
> opts->force code path we could use prime_cache_tree() (like
> read-tree), which is supposedly faster...
Nobody sane should be constantly running "checkout -f", so even if
priming from existing tree object
David Turner writes:
> When git checkout checks out a branch, create or update the
> cache-tree so that subsequent operations are faster.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Turner
> ---
> builtin/checkout.c| 4
> cache-tree.c | 22 --
> cache-tree.h | 1 +
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 7:20 AM, David Turner wrote:
> When git checkout checks out a branch, create or update the
> cache-tree so that subsequent operations are faster.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Turner
> ---
> builtin/checkout.c| 4
> cache-tree.c | 22 --
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
