Re: [PATCH 1/3] reset: add --stage and --work options

2013-09-08 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: >> Either way it doesn't matter because Junio is determined to stand >> alone versus the rest of the world in this issue. > > Which is why he's the maintainer. Send in incremental updates, and he > should be fine

Re: [PATCH 1/3] reset: add --stage and --work options

2013-09-08 Thread Ramkumar Ramachandra
Felipe Contreras wrote: > Either way it doesn't matter because Junio is determined to stand > alone versus the rest of the world in this issue. Which is why he's the maintainer. Send in incremental updates, and he should be fine. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in

Re: [PATCH 1/3] reset: add --stage and --work options

2013-09-08 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >> @@ -290,6 +294,22 @@ int cmd_reset(int argc, const char **argv, const char >> *prefix) >> hashcpy(sha1, tree->object.sha1); >> } >> >> + if (stage >= 0 || working_tree >= 0) {