On 05/16/2013 05:47 AM, Jeff King wrote:
>> I probably would have separated the rest of the patch, which is a pure
>> refactoring, from this last chunk, which is a functional change. But
>> that's just me.
>
> Yeah, I go back and forth on whether it is better to have strict
> refactors followed b
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 12:56:05AM +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> > + * This should be called from resolve_ref_unsafe when a loose ref cannot be
> > + * accessed; err must represent the errno from the last attempt to access
> > the
> > + * loose ref, and the other options are forwarded from
>
On 05/07/2013 04:38 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> [...]
> This patch solves it by factoring out the fallback code from
> the lstat() case and calling it from both places. We do not
> need to do the same thing for the symlink/readlink code
> path, even though it might receive ENOENT, too, because
> symlink
On 05/07/2013 04:38 AM, Jeff King wrote:
> When we attempt to resolve a ref, the first thing we do is
> call lstat() to see if it is a symlink or a real ref. If we
> find that the ref is missing, we fall back to looking it up
> in the packed-refs file. If we find the loose ref does exist
> (and is
4 matches
Mail list logo
