Re: [PATCH 1/6] doc: fix formatting inconsistency in githooks.txt

So the following two fixups should cleanup that page considerably.

Re: [PATCH 1/6] doc: fix formatting inconsistency in githooks.txt

Martin Ågren writes: > Your reading seems correct, so I was wrong in my speculation. My guess > is such a patch would be welcome. I checked a couple of man-pages and > this one seems particularly heavy on 'git foo' as opposed to `git foo`. > I think that's a reason to fix

Re: [PATCH 1/6] doc: fix formatting inconsistency in githooks.txt

On 10 April 2018 at 22:04, Andreas Heiduk wrote: > Am 10.04.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Martin Ågren: >> On 10 April 2018 at 20:32, Andreas Heiduk wrote: >> Hmm, I wonder if that is actually intentional. `git commit --amend` >> could be run exactly like that and

Re: [PATCH 1/6] doc: fix formatting inconsistency in githooks.txt

Am 10.04.2018 um 21:13 schrieb Martin Ågren: > On 10 April 2018 at 20:32, Andreas Heiduk wrote: >> The section 'post-rewrite' in 'githooks.txt' renders only one command >> using backticks (`git commit`) but the other commands using single quotes >> ('git-rebase'). Align this

Re: [PATCH 1/6] doc: fix formatting inconsistency in githooks.txt

On 10 April 2018 at 20:32, Andreas Heiduk wrote: > The section 'post-rewrite' in 'githooks.txt' renders only one command > using backticks (`git commit`) but the other commands using single quotes > ('git-rebase'). Align this formatting to use single quotes. > > Signed-off-by: