Re: [PATCH 13/16] repack: consider bitmaps when performing repacks
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 1:00 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> @@ -156,6 +156,11 @@ do >> fullbases="$fullbases pack-$name" >> chmod a-w "$PACKTMP-$name.pack" >> chmod a-w "$PACKTMP-$name.idx" >> + >> + test -f "$PACKTMP-$name.bitmap" && >> + chmod a-w "$PACKTMP-$name.bitmap" && >> + mv -f "$PACKTMP-$name.bitmap" "$PACKDIR/pack-$name.bitmap" > > If we see a temporary bitmap but somehow failed to move it to the > final name, should we _ignore_ that error, or should we die, like > the next two lines do? I obviously decided against dying (as you can see on the patch, har har), because the bitmap is not required for the proper operation of the Git repository, unlike the packfile and the index. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Re: [PATCH 13/16] repack: consider bitmaps when performing repacks
Vicent Marti writes: > @@ -156,6 +156,11 @@ do > fullbases="$fullbases pack-$name" > chmod a-w "$PACKTMP-$name.pack" > chmod a-w "$PACKTMP-$name.idx" > + > + test -f "$PACKTMP-$name.bitmap" && > + chmod a-w "$PACKTMP-$name.bitmap" && > + mv -f "$PACKTMP-$name.bitmap" "$PACKDIR/pack-$name.bitmap" If we see a temporary bitmap but somehow failed to move it to the final name, should we _ignore_ that error, or should we die, like the next two lines do? > mv -f "$PACKTMP-$name.pack" "$PACKDIR/pack-$name.pack" && > mv -f "$PACKTMP-$name.idx" "$PACKDIR/pack-$name.idx" || > exit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html