Peter Wu writes:
> One note, the following command spits out master without complaining about
> the
> non-existing branch name:
>
> git branch --contains master
>
> (the order of branches doesn't affect the result.)
That is perfectly normal.
What you gave after "--contains " are *not* b
On Thursday 31 January 2013 01:46:11 Jeff King wrote:
> Currently, a branch filter like `--contains`, `--merged`, or
> `--no-merged` is ignored when we are not in listing mode.
> For example:
>
> git branch --contains=foo bar
>
> will create the branch "bar" from the current HEAD, ignoring
> th
2 matches
Mail list logo
