Lukas Fleischer <g...@cryptocrack.de> writes:

> These slightly improve the reading flow by making it obvious that a list
> follows.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Fleischer <g...@cryptocrack.de>

Perhaps.

The earlier message says "contains X ref(s)" while the later one
says "requires this/these X ref(s)".  Do we want to make them
consistent, too?

> ---
>  bundle.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/bundle.c b/bundle.c
> index 65db53b..8cd8b4f 100644
> --- a/bundle.c
> +++ b/bundle.c
> @@ -183,8 +183,8 @@ int verify_bundle(struct bundle_header *header, int 
> verbose)
>               struct ref_list *r;
>  
>               r = &header->references;
> -             printf_ln(Q_("The bundle contains %d ref",
> -                          "The bundle contains %d refs",
> +             printf_ln(Q_("The bundle contains %d ref:",
> +                          "The bundle contains %d refs:",
>                            r->nr),
>                         r->nr);
>               list_refs(r, 0, NULL);
> @@ -192,8 +192,8 @@ int verify_bundle(struct bundle_header *header, int 
> verbose)
>               if (!r->nr) {
>                       printf_ln(_("The bundle records a complete history."));
>               } else {
> -                     printf_ln(Q_("The bundle requires this ref",
> -                                  "The bundle requires these %d refs",
> +                     printf_ln(Q_("The bundle requires this ref:",
> +                                  "The bundle requires these %d refs:",
>                                    r->nr),
>                                 r->nr);
>                       list_refs(r, 0, NULL);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to