On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 08:47:39AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>
> >> ... ...
> >> +}
> >
> > Nice, I'm glad you handled this case properly. I've wondered if we
> > should have an option to do a similar test when writing out the "real"
> > message format. I.e., to put the e
Jeff King writes:
>> ... ...
>> +}
>
> Nice, I'm glad you handled this case properly. I've wondered if we
> should have an option to do a similar test when writing out the "real"
> message format. I.e., to put the extra "From" line in the body of the
> message when !is_current_user(). Traditiona
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 06:13:28PM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:26:22PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > Some people may find it convenient to append a simple patch at the
> > bottom of a discussion e-mail separated by a "scissors" mark, ready
> > to be applied with "git
Junio C Hamano writes:
> Jeff King writes:
>
>>> @@ -421,6 +443,9 @@ void pp_user_info(const struct pretty_print_context *pp,
>>> if (pp->mailmap)
>>> map_user(pp->mailmap, &mailbuf, &maillen, &namebuf, &namelen);
>>>
>>> + if (pp->inline_single && is_current_user(pp, mailbuf
Jeff King writes:
>> @@ -421,6 +443,9 @@ void pp_user_info(const struct pretty_print_context *pp,
>> if (pp->mailmap)
>> map_user(pp->mailmap, &mailbuf, &maillen, &namebuf, &namelen);
>>
>> +if (pp->inline_single && is_current_user(pp, mailbuf, maillen, namebuf,
>> namele
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:26:22PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Some people may find it convenient to append a simple patch at the
> bottom of a discussion e-mail separated by a "scissors" mark, ready
> to be applied with "git am -c". Introduce "--inline-single" option
> to format-patch to do s
6 matches
Mail list logo
