Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitignore.txt: clarify recursive nature of excluded directories

2013-11-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Thanks; will queue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitignore.txt: clarify recursive nature of excluded directories

2013-11-07 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 09:27:16PM +0100, Karsten Blees wrote: > > How about: > > > > It is not possible to re-include a file if a parent directory of that > > file is excluded. Once git considers a directory excluded, it does not > > descend into the directory to consider its contents furt

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitignore.txt: clarify recursive nature of excluded directories

2013-11-07 Thread Karsten Blees
Am 07.11.2013 20:55, schrieb Jeff King: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:37:38AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> Junio C Hamano writes: >> >>> Karsten Blees writes: >>> Additionally, precedence of negated patterns is exactly as outlined in the DESCRIPTION section, we don't need to repeat

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitignore.txt: clarify recursive nature of excluded directories

2013-11-07 Thread Jeff King
On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 11:37:38AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > > > Karsten Blees writes: > > > >> Additionally, precedence of negated patterns is exactly as outlined in > >> the DESCRIPTION section, we don't need to repeat this. > > > > Very good, thanks. > > > > Eve

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitignore.txt: clarify recursive nature of excluded directories

2013-11-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Junio C Hamano writes: > Karsten Blees writes: > >> Additionally, precedence of negated patterns is exactly as outlined in >> the DESCRIPTION section, we don't need to repeat this. > > Very good, thanks. > > Even though I have a suspicion that somebody else may be able to > come up with a better

Re: [PATCH 2/2] gitignore.txt: clarify recursive nature of excluded directories

2013-11-07 Thread Junio C Hamano
Karsten Blees writes: > Additionally, precedence of negated patterns is exactly as outlined in > the DESCRIPTION section, we don't need to repeat this. Very good, thanks. Even though I have a suspicion that somebody else may be able to come up with a better phrase that does not sound unnecessar