Re: [PATCH 3/3] branch: add --unset-upstream option

2012-07-12 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 09:53 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Carlos Martín Nieto  writes:
> 
> > I've added a bit of code to also remove branch.foo.rebase, which
> > I'd also consider to be part of the upstream information.
> 
> If "git branch -t" or "git branch --set-upstream" took another
> option "--integrate-with=[rebase|merge]" to set the variable, I
> would agree that removing branch.$name.rebase would be the right
> thing to do, but because it is not, I do not know if it is sensible
> to remove it upon --unset-upstream.

I'll drop it then.

   cmn


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 3/3] branch: add --unset-upstream option

2012-07-11 Thread Junio C Hamano
Carlos Martín Nieto  writes:

> I've added a bit of code to also remove branch.foo.rebase, which
> I'd also consider to be part of the upstream information.

If "git branch -t" or "git branch --set-upstream" took another
option "--integrate-with=[rebase|merge]" to set the variable, I
would agree that removing branch.$name.rebase would be the right
thing to do, but because it is not, I do not know if it is sensible
to remove it upon --unset-upstream.

I actually thought about commenting on that exact variable in my
review, saying that the patch was correct that it didn't touch it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 3/3] branch: add --unset-upstream option

2012-07-11 Thread Carlos Martín Nieto
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 11:02 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Carlos Martín Nieto  writes:
> 
> > We have ways of setting the upstream information, but if we want to
> > unset it, we need to resort to modifying the configuration manually.
> >
> > Teach branch an --unset-upstream option that unsets this information.
> >
> > ---
> >
> > create_branch() uses install_branch_config() which may also set
> > branch.foo.rebase, so this version might leave some configuration
> > laying around.
> >
> > I wonder if deleting the whole branch.foo section would be better. Can
> > we be sure that nothing else shows up there?
> 
> "branch.foo.$unknown" may not be related to upstream at all, so that
> will not fly.  Besides, we already have unknown=description, no?

Ah yes, that exists. I've added a bit of code to also remove
branch.foo.rebase, which I'd also consider to be part of the upstream
information.

   cmn


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 3/3] branch: add --unset-upstream option

2012-07-10 Thread Junio C Hamano
Carlos Martín Nieto  writes:

> We have ways of setting the upstream information, but if we want to
> unset it, we need to resort to modifying the configuration manually.
>
> Teach branch an --unset-upstream option that unsets this information.
>
> ---
>
> create_branch() uses install_branch_config() which may also set
> branch.foo.rebase, so this version might leave some configuration
> laying around.
>
> I wonder if deleting the whole branch.foo section would be better. Can
> we be sure that nothing else shows up there?

"branch.foo.$unknown" may not be related to upstream at all, so that
will not fly.  Besides, we already have unknown=description, no?

If you are removing the branch "foo", it would make sense, though.

> + } else if (unset_upstream) {
> + struct branch *branch = branch_get(argv[0]);
> + struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> +
> + strbuf_addf(&buf, "branch.%s.remote", branch->name);
> + git_config_set_multivar(buf.buf, NULL, NULL, 1);

This part makes sense, as "--set-upstream" is about setting the
value of branch.foo.remote to 'origin' or whatever.

> + strbuf_reset(&buf);
> + strbuf_addf(&buf, "branch.%s.merge", branch->name);
> + git_config_set_multivar(buf.buf, NULL, NULL, 1);

This also makes sense because "branch.foo.merge" names a ref in the
context of the remote.  A branch may have integrated with the "dev"
branch at "origin" repository; when it is modified to slurp changes
from "central" repository from now on, there is nothing that says
that the branch "dev" at this different remote corresponds to the
"dev" branch at the original "origin" repository (such a branch may
not even exist at the new "central" repository).  There is no point
leaving the "branch.foo.merge" configuration behind when you unset
the upstream information.



> + strbuf_release(&buf);
>   } else if (argc > 0 && argc <= 2) {
>   struct branch *branch = branch_get(argv[0]);
>   const char *old_upstream = NULL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html