Vicent Martà wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> +#if __BYTE_ORDER != __BIG_ENDIAN
>>
>> Is this portable?
>
> We explicitly set the __BYTE_ORDER macros in `compat/bswap.h`. In
> fact, this preprocessor conditional is the same one that we use when
> choosing what
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> --- a/ewah/ewah_io.c
>> +++ b/ewah/ewah_io.c
>> @@ -112,23 +112,38 @@ int ewah_serialize(struct ewah_bitmap *self, int fd)
> [...]
>> +#if __BYTE_ORDER != __BIG_ENDIAN
>
> Is this portable?
We explicitly set the __BYTE_ORDER macros in `c
Jeff King wrote:
> --- a/ewah/ewah_io.c
> +++ b/ewah/ewah_io.c
> @@ -112,23 +112,38 @@ int ewah_serialize(struct ewah_bitmap *self, int fd)
[...]
> +#if __BYTE_ORDER != __BIG_ENDIAN
Is this portable?
On a platform without __BYTE_ORDER or __BIG_ENDIAN defined,
it is interpreted as
#if 0
3 matches
Mail list logo