On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:48 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Duy Nguyen wrote:
>> Exactly. I already explained why %(upstream) can't be used in 00/09.
>> "tracking" may not be perfect. Somebody might want
>> "tracking:upstream:short". It does not look quite nice.
>
> Which is why I suggested kee
Duy Nguyen wrote:
> Exactly. I already explained why %(upstream) can't be used in 00/09.
> "tracking" may not be perfect. Somebody might want
> "tracking:upstream:short". It does not look quite nice.
Which is why I suggested keeping upstream, upstream:short, and
introducing upstream:diff and upstr
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
> wrote:
>> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>>> diff --git a/builtin/for-each-ref.c b/builtin/for-each-ref.c
>>> index 498d703..b10d48a 100644
>>> --- a/builtin/for-each-ref.c
>>> +++ b/bu
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra
wrote:
> Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
>> diff --git a/builtin/for-each-ref.c b/builtin/for-each-ref.c
>> index 498d703..b10d48a 100644
>> --- a/builtin/for-each-ref.c
>> +++ b/builtin/for-each-ref.c
>> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static struct {
>>
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> diff --git a/builtin/for-each-ref.c b/builtin/for-each-ref.c
> index 498d703..b10d48a 100644
> --- a/builtin/for-each-ref.c
> +++ b/builtin/for-each-ref.c
> @@ -76,6 +76,8 @@ static struct {
> { "symref" },
> { "flag" },
> { "current" },
> +
5 matches
Mail list logo